User talk:195.27.12.180

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Vandalism

Why have you vandalised the Richard Farleigh page?

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by VitaminK (talk • contribs).

[edit] welcome

Welcome!

Hello, 195.27.12.180, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

xCentaur |  talk  15:03, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Glenrothes

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 195.27.12.180! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 14:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and will be removed. Thanks. Shadowbot 17:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop spamming Wikipedia. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. Shadowbot 17:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Vasanas. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Triwbe 12:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Glenrothes has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cometstyles 09:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kilnburn

here,here. i found your comment "Why do these retailers keep getting listed? It never even happened!" to be disrespectful of my work. yes, most people on here loathe shops, but Borders and H&M are well-known brands which are practially nonexistant in Fife and even showed their intention to come here at one stage, not just for Kirkcaldy but the wider population: Glenrothes, Dunfermline, Perth & Kinross, Falkirk and Stirling.

i'm being extremely nice though, since it has lesser importance, i'll let the edit remain, but please don't be rude to me again. Kilnburn (talk) 20:46, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

well,195.27...... why is this being allowed to happen then, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_Shopping_Centre and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenock#Transport (under Trade and Commerence). hmmmm........now that's a bit unfair isn't it. you'll probably want to do something about it.

shops should be kept to be a minimum and i believe if they must be mentioned, they must be backed by sources where possible, particularly if they have importance in the town/city. of course, i know HMV now exists, but they obviously were still interested in the town even after the collapse of the original Waterfront plan.

i'm fine with constructive criticism, but i do have slight asperger's syndrome which does it make it hard sometimes for me to appreciate this, hence i was trying to be as understanding as best i as i could. i will allow your edit to be kept and that's it, now wasn't that a nice gesture from me.

after all, it's all for the best of the appearance of the article, anyway, you or nor i can not argue with that now hopefully. Kilnburn (talk) 09:39, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Westfield London worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  S3000  ☎ 14:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Thomas Keneally has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Closedmouth (talk) 11:57, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Thomas Keneally constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Closedmouth (talk) 11:59, 3 June 2008 (UTC)