User talk:195.229.236.213

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 195.229.236.213, is registered to Etisalat, an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range is currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, please contact unblock-en-l for assistance. We apologize for any inconvenience. -- {Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! -->}

Contents

[edit] Blocked by User:Ryulong for an Invalid Reason

((unblock|I recently attempted to edit from this ip and encountered a message "used by Husnock banned by arbitration case". The trouble with that statement is that it isnt true. Husnock was never banned according to this. Please unblock. This ip addresses is used by a major computer lab. Thank you.))

I have altered the block summary and changed the length of the block to support what is actually going on with this IP.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 13:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

The block log has been revised; please contact the unblock-en mailing list as instructed if you wish to obtain an account for editing purposes. Thank you, Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I've unblocked as I can't see why the IP was blocked in the first place, and there's been no response from Ryulong. Neil ╦ 19:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I've reblocked. This IP is constantly used by individuals to vandalize. I have reblocked it because of the abuse we get from it.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 00:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)s

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "There has been no vandalism out of this ip for over a month and it is a shared ip address used by a computer log. Ryulong has reblocked it for no reason other than "contant distribution" whicvh I dipsute. This is also prevented an entire computer lab from accessing Wikipedia. Please put personal feelings aside, understand that this is a shared ip address used by hundreds of people, and unblock it. Thank you."

Decline reason: "Actually, it is blocked because it is being used by the banned vandal, Husnock. The block message explains who to contact if you wish to continue editing from this address. — Yamla 18:16, 15 June 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Here we go again. HUSNOCK WAS NEVER BANNED! Please review Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Husnock. The user was never blocked, banned, or in anyway prevented from using Wikipeida. Ryulong's initial block was deemed improper per the Wikipedia:Admin Noticeboard and was reversed. He then reblocked the account for no reason. Please unblock. This is getting ridiculous."

Decline reason: "Please contact unblocken-l mailing list if you wish to continue editing from this IP address. The only reason this IP address is blocked is because it is currently being used by a banned user, as mentioned above. — SunStar Net talk 11:01, 16 June 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

  • Unblocked. Husnock is not banned, and the best way to deal with his contributions, if you object, is simply to ingore them. Thatcher131 12:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Vellore Institute of Technology, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Geniac 18:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  2. Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Vellore Institute of Technology. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Thank you. --Geniac 14:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
  3. Please do not add non-notable names to the list of birthdays or deaths, such as those you added to July 13. As the comments in the list suggest, only names that have corresponding Wikipedia articles are eligible for the list. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. Thank you. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 17:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
  4. Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Vellore Institute of Technology. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Geniac 04:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Foodfight!, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Foodfight! was changed by 195.229.236.213 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-03T18:16:13+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Foodfight! constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Jonathan 18:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC))

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Loyalist (American Revolution), you will be blocked from editing. JD554 (talk) 14:50, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Loyalist (American Revolution). Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 14:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Block.

To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network.

In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.}

· AndonicO Hail! 18:07, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Statistics relating to enlargement of the European Union has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Mdebets (talk) 17:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Swabi District has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 19:09, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Swabi District constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 19:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC))

Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. LittleOldMe (talk) 15:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Charles Sobhraj.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Harry the Dog WOOF 14:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Thottada (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 15:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to American International School - Abu Dhabi has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Pseudomonas(talk) 15:28, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to List of Iranian Arabs constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 15:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC))