User talk:195.188.152.12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily semi-protected from editing to prevent disruptive actions.

 Editing of this page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled to prevent 195.188.152.12 (talk • contribs • block logauto) and other new users from making disruptive edits.
See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can request unprotection, log in, or create an account.
Image:Info-pictogram.pngAttention:

This IP address, 195.188.152.12, is registered to Telewest Broadband, an Internet service provider through which thousands of individual users may connect to the internet. This IP may be randomly assigned to a different person when the current user disconnects. Warnings or messages left on this page may not be received by the intended user. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.


This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hexagon1 00:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Contents

Rhodes Scholarship

Thanks for your changes to the Rhodes Scholarship article and removal of some significant POV. --Grouse 20:44, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC).

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Gaz! may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. By starting an account or logging in, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. -- MacAddct1984 17:00, May 22, 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Wgfinley 15:13, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

User page

Wiki is a not a site to show yourself off. This page should be destroyed.

That is one of the funniest things I have ever heard. "This page should be destroyed." Ah ha ha. I don't know why it's so funny. It just is. → JarlaxleArtemis 21:30, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. DJ Clayworth 19:47, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Re: God

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed or reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- KHM03 21:59, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Population figures

Hi. Please do not change population figures piecemeal. These are all taken from the same source (the 2001 census and its definition of urban areas), and you can't just simply change one figure independently of the others. Morwen - Talk 12:17, 11. November 2005 (UTC)

Welcome, become a user

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~. DaGizza Chat (c) 06:00, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with the page Supply and demand on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Kbh3rdtalk 02:15, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

edit any article! Your test on List of famous bands from Liverpool worked and was deleted. Please use the Sandbox for future testing.

— Ilyanep (Talk) 02:20, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to German Goo Girls, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 09:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Royboycrashfan 14:01, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

German Goo Girls

Your addition to the article was having an informal tone. Statements like ..(she) is particularly attractive, and really seems to enjoy herself disrupt the neutrality of the article (see WP:NPOV). If you wish you can add the same reference again, but please do leave edit summaries & adhere to WP:NPOV. Also for editing sensitive article like Pornography, consider signing up, as editing such articles as an IP address can attract vandalism warnings.

Thanks

Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 09:42, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Agreed re: comment "particularly attractive", disagree re: comment "enjoying herself" this must be viewed in the context of the preceding paragraph about Betty.

195.188.152.12 09:47, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

I suggest you revisit the definition of Wikipedia:Vandalism before you go throwing the term around willy nilly.

195.188.152.12 07:55, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm very familiar with the definition of Wikipedia:Vandalism,thank you .Looking at your talk page, it seems you too know the definition quite well as you are practising it. Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 08:29, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

This talk page is shared by anyone using blueyonder ISP. And from the look of your talk page User_talk:Srikeit there's many others who have problems with your reversions. 195.188.152.12 08:36, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Well when an anon does not leave an edit summary for the edits they make, it may appear like vandalism. The users can always discuss it on my talk page & can add the info again with an edit summary as I suggest in my warnings. And talking about good faith I highly doubt these [1], [2] edits wre made in good faith. Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 08:49, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

(P.S If you wish to really make good faith edits you may consider signing up)

ILovePlankton

This IP address belongs to the web proxy used by users of Blueyonder, a cable broadband ISP in the UK.

becuase it does not have a nuetral point of view. ILovEPlankton 17:11, 22 April 2006 (UTC) Note:Comment was on IP's user page, moved to talk page. _-M o P-_ 23:46, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

==Please Use Edit Summaries==

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 09:08, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Yes it is not compulsory to leave edit summaries. But as said above the abscence of edit summaries & the fact that you are editing as an IP address & the fact that you have a history of vandalism warnings, will make your edits look like vandalism. Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 09:12, 23 April 2006 (UTC)


Please make it clear what of the above is your personal interpretation and what is Wikipedia policy. For example, "When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism " is your personal interpretation of the lack of an edit summary.


Also you do not seem to understand that the IP address is shared by many thousands of users and a history of warnings is quite irrelevant. 195.188.152.12 09:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

This is not my personal interpretation. See m:Help:Edit summary (I had also provided this link above). The above text which I added was a Wikipedia template (add {{summary)) to the Sandbox & see). If you don't feel like clicking on the above link I'll quote the introduction for you.

Always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s)

Also if you want to make important contributions to Wikipedia, consider signing up. Signing up will give you a username which will not reveal your IP address, you will have a separate talk page for yourself & you will not recieve vandalism warnings for edits not made by you. Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 09:33, 23 April 2006 (UTC)


I did read the link and NOWHERE does it say that "When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism"195.188.152.12 09:37, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism June 2006

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to iambic pentameter. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Stumps 05:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Angel

Your recent edit to Angel (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 15:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Son of Dork, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kedi the tramp (talk • contribs • count) (Respond to me on my Talk.) 15:11, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Sunholm

Hi, thanks for your message, but I'm not Sunholm. I do know him though. and the M62Manchester too... two different people, very different!! --Whitmarewood 10:21, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

October 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Kim Jong-il. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- ShinmaWa(talk) 12:44, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MER-C 13:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. Ziusudra 14:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Geni 15:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Pringles (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Enzyme, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DMacks 17:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Pantelimon

Your recent edit to Pantelimon (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 18:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Gamaliel 18:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Please use the sandbox

Many users, myself included, have recieved a warning on our user page. Please use the sandbox. The warning fools no-one and is highly irritating.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Mapletip 00:13, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Permanent block

Nothing but bad edits and WoW vandalism. Bye-bye. - Lucky 6.9 00:18, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Note: This IP's autoblock expired December 2006, see this diff.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism to the page User talk:195.188.152.12. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. Your block will expire in 6 months. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Deskana (For Great Justice!) 00:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

July 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to The Carphone Warehouse, you will be blocked from editing. east.718 19:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — Scientizzle 19:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

— Scientizzle 19:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)