User talk:195.172.110.174

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to William Rodriguez. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 19:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to William Rodriguez, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: William Rodriguez was changed by 195.172.110.174 (c) (t) deleting 21391 characters on 2007-11-27T19:33:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to William Rodriguez, you will be blocked from editing. delldot talk 19:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
OK, thanks for giving me the heads up. I'll take a look at it and get back to you in a minute, OK? delldot talk 19:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

User is new and unfamiliar with our practices, was attempting to correct problems. Has been instructed.

Request handled by: JodyB talk 22:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about the block, I talked to the admin that did it, we'll have it straightened out in a minute just as soon as I get a chance to look at the edit closer. Thanks for being patient. Peace, delldot talk 19:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
It looks like you may have a point; you shouldn't have been blocked. However, you should read up on WP:3RR, which states not to constantly keep reverting. And are you User:Jrandi, User:Magical123, User:CrucifytheEgo, User:Crazyossi, User:Valjean16? If so, you might want to read up on WP:SOCK. In any case, please discuss major changes on the talk page; blank removing everything usually does not work well on Wikipedia. Or, if you believe the article violates WP:BLP, you can make a note at WP:BLP/N to have people look into, especially if you are the said subject. The Evil Spartan (talk) 20:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey again, sorry to take so long to get back to you. I looked over the whole article, removed the bits I thought were problematic (please let me know if I've missed some), and started a discussion about it on the article's talk page. I asked the blocking admin to consider unblocking you, but I think they're offline for now, so you'll have to keep being patient, sorry! Again, thanks for bringing up the problems.
I wholly endorse The Evil Spartan's advice about familiarizing yourself with the policies about editing, because you'll run into problems again and again unless you do, even though you mean well.
I'll watch this page in case you have anything to discuss before you're unblocked or it expires, and after that don't hesitate to leave me another note on my talk page. Peace, delldot talk 21:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I am the blocking administrator. I am lifting this block inasmuch as you seem to be acting in good faith although your editing was not as it should have been. You failed to take heed of WP:3RR, you failed to leave edit summaries explaining your actions and you blanked large sections of text. You need to ask for help in these situations. I am assuming you are new and simply did not know, however there were warnings placed on your page. Please work with us and we will clear these problems. JodyB talk 22:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)