User talk:195.152.249.12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 195.152.249.12, is registered to Telegraph Group, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] January 2007

Thank you for experimenting with the page Abnormality (behavior) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Kafziel Talk 17:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Con Coughlin, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Con Coughlin was changed by 195.152.249.12 (u) (t) deleting 10987 characters on 2008-02-21T11:37:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Con Coughlin constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 15:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC))

[edit] Daniel Hannan

With these edits you removed a lot of encyclopedically relevant material (e.g. about Hannan's expulsion from the EPP and the background of it). Since you also introduced new material, some if it definitely relevant to the article (his present positions on EP committees, I assumed they changed on the expulsion) I'm not branding it vandalism (it's a borderline case), but it was definitely what we call heavily "POV" and tendentious editing. Some suggestions:

  • Do not remove relevant material from articles on Wikipedia! Please be aware that removal of referenced material is usually seen as vandalism!
  • If you add or update information, especially on, source it clearly.
  • Read the guidelines on a neutral point of view and conflicts of interest. Uninlogged edits of the kind you have done, from a media group of the same political orientation as the subject of the article, and where the subject of the article has a blog, is very much an indication of a conflict of interest.
  • Additions of political areas Hannan has campaigned on/worked for is OK, but write respecting the NPOV guidelines and use sources for everything.

By the way, I've tried to polish the "Treason at Maastricht" & conspiracy theory statements. However, in the light of the "Nazi remarks" in the EP, the use of previous Nazi comparisons of the EU definitely becomes encyclopedically relevant, so this information has to remain in the article. Regards, Tomas e (talk) 11:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Norman Bettison‎

Thanks for experimenting with the page Norman Bettison‎ on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 17:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)