Talk:1950 in New Zealand
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] NON factual, NON-verifiable, multiple content?
""Radio and Television
See: 1950 in New Zealand television ,1950 in television , List of TVNZ television programming , Category:New Zealand television , TV3 (New Zealand) , Category:New Zealand television shows , Public broadcasting in New Zealand""
does ANY of this apply? and how much of this is spammed through the rest of the articles? if it really is NON factual, NON-verifiable, multiple content, then isnt that spam of its own kind? I understand how it came to be, but i dont understand how it can still be here, that to me proves different rules apply as suits the occassion, and thats a little un-settling, and thats why i'm pushin the point gently, but repeatedly, to observe the responses. I truly dont care much about how long it stays here, but its quite interesting to scan your contribution history, and see how much other editing you are doing, that is prioritised over this mess. I dont get it, thats true, but i'm still here trying. moza 14:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)