User talk:194.72.81.141

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 194.72.81.141, is registered to Unite Intergrated Solutions, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

Welcome...

Welcome!
Welcome!

Hello, 194.72.81.141, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I would recommend that you get a username by clicking sign up. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. As a registered user, you gain the use of an appropriate username of your choice, a personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you, the ability to start new pages, and much more. Also, your IP address, 194.72.81.141, will no longer be visible to other users.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 20:04, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

[edit] November 2007

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ohm's law, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 14:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
  2. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Pete Sampras appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. --Madchester (talk) 02:01, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
  3. I noticed this line in the talk page of the article on Pro Pedophile Activism: "Paedophilia is wrong. I hope that clarifies some of the issues." While I understand what I think you mean, remarks like these are unconstructive, and may spark incivility. It can be seen as trolling. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
    Thinking about it, it may be a good idea to strike that comment, putting it between <s> </s>. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:48, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
    I replied on your comment on my talkpage. Happy editing. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
    Another reply on my talk. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:26, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

  1. Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Andy Fordham worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Keith D (talk) 20:23, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Obafemi Martins. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. S♦s♦e♦b♦a♦l♦l♦o♦s (Talk to Me) 23:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
  3. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mixed Martial Arts. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. For removing picture from info box because you thought it was "distasteful". David Broadfoot (talk) 01:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
    If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  4. Please do not add unsourced or possibly unverifiable information to Wikipedia, as you did to Sky Bet. Thank you. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:27, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
  5. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. STORMTRACKER 94 18:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
    If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] January 2008

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tugay Kerimoğlu, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tugay Kerimoğlu was changed by 194.72.81.141 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-02T16:51:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dean Windass, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dean Windass was changed by 194.72.81.141 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-07T20:20:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:20, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Pedophilia. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you. Jons63 (talk) 01:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Blocked
    You have been blocked for vandalism for a period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

    If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  Kukini hablame aqui 20:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
  1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Fursuit, you will be blocked from editing. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 12:01, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
    If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
  2. This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Stephen Lee. —Animum (talk) 20:02, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to UBS AG‎, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 20:04, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tiny Silver Hammers, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tiny Silver Hammers was changed by 194.72.81.141 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-29T00:16:34+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bad Guy (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Timmeh! 00:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Hi, the recent edit you made to Jacques Babinet has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 17:24, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
    The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Dave Harold, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 21:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


  1. 22 Feb 2008: Same nonsense with Western (genre). Viva-Verdi (talk) 19:13, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GDonato (talk) 23:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Khawaja has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 01:21, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Orbital eccentricity has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 09:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Severe acute respiratory syndrome (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 01:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Herpes simplex has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to International Tibet Independence Movement. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 22:29, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to International Tibet Independence Movement. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Oxymoron83 22:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)