User talk:194.60.38.10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Info-pictogram.png Attention:

This IP address, 194.60.38.10, is registered to Information Systems, Parliament of the United Kingdom and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Information Systems, Parliament of the United Kingdom to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. It might be a good idea to create an account so you can continue conversations and not have to share an edit history with others at Parliament of the United Kingdom. You do not have to use your real name. --Audiovideo 20:40, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Please stop removing references from the Independent Green Voice article. The issue is not whether they are about the "main subject", but whether they provide evidence for statements in the article. Warofdreams talk 14:09, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Please stop adding nonsense to wikipedia, as you did with Midrash. The comment is funny, but is considered vandalism and really doesn't help make Wikipedia a better resource. --DreamsReign 11:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] June 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Andrew Murray (tennis player), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JD[talk|email] 11:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2006

Your addition of comments about the "Primary School Teacher Tom Hurd" to a variety of celebrity pages is vandalism, please stop it --Henweb 12:48, 10th October 2006

[edit] Randall Flagg

Please stop adding speculation to the pages.--CyberGhostface 13:04, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Ghostface (Scream)

Your recent edit to Ghostface (Scream) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 10:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during September 20, 2006 (UTC) to Jigsaw Killer

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. MER-C 10:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. User:Demonicanglian 12:52, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Anne Snelgrove

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Talk:Anne Snelgrove, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.annesnelgrove.labour.co.uk/ViewPage.cfm?Page=16746. As a copyright violation, Talk:Anne Snelgrove appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Talk:Anne Snelgrove has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Talk:Anne Snelgrove. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Talk:Anne Snelgrove, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 11:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kazakhstan

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, puerile edits, such as those you made to Kazakhstan, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing. Please consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Beve 11:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


[edit] May 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Salma Shah. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ctbolt 10:46, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


[edit] June 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Shona McIsaac, you will be blocked from editing. Spellcast 10:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Ed (Edgar181) 13:43, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sarah Teather

Wikipedia is not a warzone for a political candidate. Actively communicate and engage in dialogue on the Talk page or you will blocked from editing. Back up ANY AND ALL deletions and additions to this page or that of Dawn Butler with references from news sources/reliable sources and reasoning based on Wikipedia policy. Thankyou 189.142.176.106 10:08, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning regarding articles Dawn Butler and Sarah Teather

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. — OwenBlacker 17:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Salma Shah. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eliz81 14:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Sarah Teather

From what I understand this is a shared IP address in HoP, but if you did not make the edit to Sarah Teather [1] then you may ignore this message. The information I added to the article today was to bring the article in line with Wikipedia guidelines. I understand that the subject has expressed concerns over WP:BLP to do with MPs. So I removed most of the material which is not about Sarah directly but which speculates about things which are not part of Sarah's bio. This includes detail edits which talk about other people and which analyses the results in 2003 and 2005. She won and then increased her majority, the by-election was the first loss in 15 years, these are the facts, anything else is unsourced speculation. I also add that Sarah's height is only notable if it is a growth disorder, which I assume it is not. When you re-edited the statement about baby of the house you removed a sourced statement, this is frowned upon, do not removed sourced information from the article, but feel free to add sourced info, or find sources for those statements currently without sources. I am going to paste a level 2 warning below this message, if you do not know the fully how to edit the article to add the information you want do not hesitate to message me at my talk page. This IP has several warnings, you are in danger of this IP being blocked if you continue to edit like this.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Darrenhusted 16:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dean Close School, you will be blocked from editing. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

This is your last warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Dean Close School, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gscshoyru 11:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] John Bercow

Although there has been a great deal of speculation, no news source has announced that John Bercow is joining the Labour Party. Can you stop adding this information? Unless it happens and there is a reliable source to confirm it, it contravenes policy on biographies of living people, being a controversial claim. Sam Blacketer 10:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jim Murphy

I have reverted the changes you made to Jim Murphy. Before changing again, please read the talkpage for that article - in brief, there are breaches of WP:NPOV and the syntax needs sorting out.

Many thanks Grblundell 20:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jim Murphy

I've added a comment to Talk:Jim Murphy, which I hope may help mpove this article forward. I'd be grateful if you'd look at it and if necessary add comments. Grblundell 08:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Salma Shah, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Salma Shah was changed by 194.60.38.10 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-11-14T16:01:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 16:01, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Salma Shah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mumia-w-18 17:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Salma Shah deletions

Why do you feel the need to delete from Salma Shah? The entire article is probably going to be deleted soon anyway.--Mumia-w-18 17:17, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism warning

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Subdolous (talk) 17:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Hayley Matthews

An editor has nominated Hayley Matthews, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayley Matthews and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:29, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Silverchair page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC) My mistake, sorry. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Alex Salmond, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. BigDunc (talk) 18:39, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Shrewsbury School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. The Helpful One (Review) 13:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Belvedere Incinerator

Please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a soapbox. It appears that the incinerator is opposed by local representatives of all political persuasions including the Mayor of London (Labour), local MP (labour), Bexley council (Conservative) and individual councillors (Conservative) who are not in themselves notable enough to appear in an encyclopedia. It is perfectly reasonable to report the controversy. However your recent edits to this article seem to have been made to promote the political interests of specific councillors of one political party, and multiple references given that are links to a party political website, not to impartial sources of reference, and in the period running up to local elections. Please no not continue to do this. Pterre (talk) 16:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Widdecombe's cat

What is the source of "deceased" please? RSVP here. 91.106.42.134 (talk) 12:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ultra! 12:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] June 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MER-C 12:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.