User talk:194.176.105.40

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, inetgw-62-sec.nhs.uk, is registered to National Health Service (UK), and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] January 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to King Edward VI Camp Hill. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

This refers to edits here and here, which introduced nonsense to the article. Struway2 (talk) 17:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added to the page Super Duper Tuesday do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Kralizec! (talk) 23:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orthodontic Technicians Association Conference 2008

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Orthodontic Technicians Association Conference 2008, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 10:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to King Edward VI Camp Hill, you will be blocked from editing. This notice refers to repeatedly inserting nonsense featuring someone called Ian Briggs into this article. Struway2 (talk) 15:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to King Edward VI Camp Hill, you will be blocked from editing. Struway2 (talk) 16:13, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Acroterion (talk) 16:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network.

In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "1 month is far too harsh, and gives out the wrong message anyway. Please reduce the duration of the block, otherwise you will only succeed in getting people's backs up"

Decline reason: "People's backs are of no interest to us. Inadequate request. — Sandstein (talk) 12:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Well they should be, if you care about this encyclopedia and its reputation"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This address has been the source of extensive vandalism, with repeated blocks. The next step if vandalism resumes will be a three-month block. The conditions of the block permit registered users to edit, as the template above describes. This is Wikipedia practice for abuse from shared IP addresses: a one-month block is entirely consistent with the edit history of this address. Acroterion (talk) 14:46, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

{{helpme|I have noticed that in the Lymington article there is a gramatically incorrect sentence that reads "It is a major yachting centre with a three marinas." in one of the opening paragraphs. Idiots have caused this IP to be blocked so can someone fix this for me? Thanks.

I have also noticed that the article Almansa has a diagram that claims to show the "Location of Almansa in Spain", whereas it should read "Location of Almansa within the province of Albacete"}}
Did them. -- Menti fisto 10:01, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock request denied

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "shared NHS ip"

Decline reason: "The block is in place to prevent vandalism to Wikipedia from this IP. Given the frequency of vandalism from this shared IP, it was approrpiate to block for a long period of time. The block will expire on February 4th, when anonymous editing can restart. If you wish to edit now, create an account as described above. If vandalism resumes when the block expires, expect another lengthy block. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 13:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I don't want to have to wait 12 days, you may as well just unblock this IP as the vandals have probably gone by now"

Decline reason: "Per Jayron32. Stifle (talk) 10:58, 23 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

You can create an account as described above if you wish to edit. Stifle (talk) 10:59, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Please stop vandalizing this page. If you continue to do that I will protect the page to prevent you from editing even here. If you wish to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, please get an account. Vandalizing this page significantly damages the case that this IP should be unblocked. Gwernol 15:27, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "SharedIP - N3 Service provider"

Decline reason: "Due to abuse, anonymous editing and registration of accounts from this address has been blocked. If you intend to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, please register an account from a different computer, such as your home, or ask an editor in good standing to create an account for you. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:35, 30 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Main Page, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Talk:Main Page was changed by 194.176.105.40 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-14T13:10:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Heh, you beat me to it!

The recent edit you made to Shallot constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Scarian Call me Pat 14:14, 14 February 2008 (UTC))

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 15:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi to all other vandals who share this IP. I've noticed you've been doing some good work recently!

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons. Scarian Call me Pat 15:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nonsense of Image talk:K700i-acat(22).jpg

leftHello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image talk:K700i-acat(22).jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image talk:K700i-acat(22).jpg provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image talk:K700i-acat(22).jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Metformin

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Metformin, you will be blocked from editing. — Ashley VH (talk) 18:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Medical tourism

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Medical tourism, you will be blocked from editing. Ashley VH (talk) 18:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 3 months from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 18:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I iz 100% innocent"

Decline reason: "No you're not. See this, among others. And don't post another unblock request unless you're serious. --Daniel Case (talk) 11:28, 15 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "The last request was deadly serious. This is a shared IP and the vandalism was not done by me, therefore I can legitimately say that I iz 100% innocent"

Decline reason: "Given the large pattern of near constant vandalism over several months from this IP address, it has become necessary to institute a long term block. If you wish to create an account at a different IP address, you may use THAT account to edit constructively if you wish. Incidentally, if you really believe this to be a good edit, you probably need to reconsider your reasons for editing Wikipedia. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 15:14, 15 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Incidentally, what on Earth was wrong with this anyway?

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Ok I've learnt my lesson having been blocked for this length of time. Please unblock me and I will only edit constructively from now on"

Decline reason: "This IP is a perpetual source of vandalism, and judging by your comments, appears to be non-portable, at least for the time being. I'm declining your request - if you wish for further review, please contact the unblock mailing list. ~ Riana ⁂ 15:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Damnit! Fair enough I guess if this IP was blocked for general vandalism. But if this had anything to do with it, I still don't see what the fuck I've done wrong.

Oh come on, insulting other users is clearly inappropriate. How can you believe that is in any way a useful, constructive edit? Gwernol 15:38, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "It's been long enough now. There are several users who share this IP who are nothing less than totally fed up"

Decline reason: "So are we. This is your 8th block in the last year. You've had plenty of warning, plenty of second chances, and plenty of leniency. — Jmlk 1 7 10:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "You say that as if it was I who vandalised all those times, resulting in the blocks. I assure you it is a minority of idiots who share this IP who are ruining it for the rest"

Decline reason: "The only claim made is that this IP address is a persistent and frequent source of vandalism, so has been blocked to protect the integrity of Wikipedia. If you wish to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia article, you should create an account to avoid being associated with the other people who share this IP. You can do this either when the block expires in May, or by finding another IP to access Wikipedia from to create your account. Gwernol 12:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network.

In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Comments: expires May 2008