User talk:194.128.29.93

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with the page Joyce Falconer on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Budgiekiller 11:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Regarding your edits to 2008 Premier League Darts:

Your recent edit to 2008 Premier League Darts (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 13:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to XNS:

Your recent edit to XNS (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 03:05, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit in Talk:Opus Dei[1]

Please stop. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did to Talk:Opus Dei, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Túrelio 14:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Darren Mackie has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks ➪HiDrNick! 13:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)