User talk:194.112.32.101

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

i This user is alive.
en This user comes from the English language.

Contents

[edit] welcome

Welcome!

Hello, 194.112.32.101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

[edit] October 2007 edits

Please do not delete good content that you don't agree with from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Breast fetishism. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. You need to build consensus before removing the vast majority of an article. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Cheers, Benjiboi 13:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

I think this edit was necessary and helpful. Much of the Talk page discussion (especially Talk:Breast fetishism#is_this_serious.3F, in which 194.112.32.101 participated) was about the (as one section entitled, Ridiculous) original research that made up the entire article. / edg ☺ ★ 13:27, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
I've recently discovered this page... I used the breast fetishism talk page to discuss the edits. Thanks for your comments. 194.112.32.101 17:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


The edits to Gaydar were useful. Bearian'sBooties 00:57, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I think the removal of the entertainment section would also be useful, or at least a general passage about the influence of US television programs (if significant). 194.112.32.101 17:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You are welcome

I thought you might enjoy seeing that. I updated the excellent reference you used on cisgender to reflect that it was from a chapter in a book. Nice work on finding that! Kukini hablame aqui 20:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Re-categorization of fetishes

see Talk:Sexual_fetishism #38

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

Please cite your reason for this warning. Thanks. 194.112.32.101 16:41, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] bad faith quotations

i came across your edits and addition of references to breast fetish article. not only are your claims unsuported by your supposed references, the references state clearly that fetishes are concerned only with non living objects, and another reference excludes breasts explicitly. I believe your misleading edits are bad faith and are indeed a blatant content vandalism. misquoting is a serious offence here, which undermines the whole project. please consider yourself warned.

Hello??
The sources used for the breast fetishism article do indeed refer to "breast fetishism". If you are willing to cite your disagreement then perhaps we could clarify your general statement. 194.112.32.101 16:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
the quoted psychiatric manual, and WHO site define fetish in relation to non-animate objects only (like leather etc). there is not a word about breast attraction being abnormal, and indeed abother book mentions breast fetish reported by some women only to say "breasts are secondary sexual characteristic and are typically not included in fetishes". while colloquially term may be used, it refers to no known or described DISORDER, so technically, it is not a fetish in the medical sense.
Reading your amendments to the article (which I happened to create from scratch against extremely nonsensical opposition) - I now see your interpretation of the DSM and the ICD. The nature of the fetishes is such that not every object or body part can be classified in clinical literature as subject to a fetish, so the general categories exist as a guide to what may be included as a fetish. Both the DSM and ICD do not explicitly mention breasts as subject to fetishism, but also they do mention any other object or body part. If I'm not mistaken, the DSM includes the attraction to body parts as a "partialism", which is itself a type of fetish (according to them), but on the other hand: the ICD does not mention partialisms and instead regards body parts subject to fetishes. Now, as you can probably see, the problem of the classification of fetishism and its subjects is not particularly clear, so I think the vandal tag is perhaps a little over zealous or even confused use of the instruments available.. while discussion is the principle form of debating the content of articles. 194.112.32.101 17:04, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Also, please consider using capital letters when appropriate, and please consider signing your name so I know to whom I am talking to. 194.112.32.101 17:04, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
The following clinical source (which you've removed from the article) refers to "breast fetishsm". - McConaghy, Nathaniel. 1993. Sexual Behavior: Problems and Management. Springer (Publisher). ISBN 0306441772. 194.112.32.101 17:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
In fact, the ICD does not state that "body parts" are subject to the fetish category, but just about any form of sexual preference could be included in - block "F65.9: Disorder of sexual preference, unspecified". Considering the wikipedia article includes secondary clinical sources about breast fetishism, then I think the inclusion of this is useful and probably not in "bad faith". 194.112.32.101 17:22, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Agalmatophila

Thanks for pointing out that this needed to be moved back from the grotesque 'statuephilia'. It seems to be done now. I don't know if he'll try to switch it back, but there are quite a few pages to alter if he does.81.157.63.47 (talk) 17:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)