User talk:193.60.57.14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] February 2008

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Blackadder worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 16:18, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Re: "Indeed I would argue that the same pitches in another work would not in itself constitute plagiarism. It is the way in which the piece develops that is significant. This is not POV. it's simple fact.":

The point you're missing here is that you should not "argue" within an article at all. It's your arguing itself that clearly makes the passage POV. You are certainly welcome to add a sourced rebuttal if the source is significant (one from Lloyd Webber himself, for example, would be appropriate I should think.) TheScotch (talk) 07:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

> But I wasn't arguing within the article. I was responding to your comment on the history page where you said "this is illogical, you may as well argue..." etc.