User talk:193.157.239.230

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] February 2007

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Net-net (talk • contribs) 09:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC).

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Hanover (state). Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. mattbr30 10:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Basel. It may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. mattbr30 12:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Goslar, you will be blocked. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. mattbr30 12:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Hamburg, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. mattbr30 12:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Hamburg, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. mattbr30 12:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Metros232 13:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Vandalism by German Revanchists

If you believe content is incorrect on Wikipedia, please provide references from reliable sources to back up your edits. Your edits are contradictory to other content on the site.

Also, do not impersonate another user as you did with the warnings on my talk page. Continuation of this will result in further blocks. mattbr30 14:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: German Revanchists

Firstly, those (copied) warnings were not posted by the user in question (who has never edited my talk page), and were posted by this address [1] with the username also changed by this address [2]. If you are that user, you should log in and post a message saying so.

The source for the information on the articles appears to have come from the German Wikisource entry Hernach volgend die zehen Krayß. Rather than just continually removing information from articles with no edit summary and information on the site contradicting your removals, you should edit the relevant articles on the subject (such as Lower Saxon Circle) providing reliable sources to back up your edits. Anybody wishing to express a different viewpoint should also provide references. I don't know much about the topic in question and don't have an opinion on what is correct. The reason I reverted your edits was because you provided no rationale for removing content, its removal was contradictory to the content removed, and you continued to do so after being warned not to (and to contact me if you felt the edit should not have been reverted), which I consider vandalism. If you had not ignored the warnings I posted here and contacted me after the first warning, it is unlikely that you would have been blocked. mattbr30 10:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)