User talk:193.132.159.169

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RIPE WHOIS database information → UUNET; IP address block 193.128.0.0 - 193.133.255.255

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Joe D (t) 11:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Joe D (t) 12:50, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

I've reverted your edit to Reynolds number for the second time. Reynolds numbers certainly do apply to pipes, but they are used in all cases of fluid flow- they are used in aeronautics, aerodynamics etc. etc. They don't only apply to pipes. Hope this helps.WolfKeeper 18:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Reynolds number, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- WolfKeeper 16:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users, and you will be able to:

Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, remember to sign and date your comments by typing four tildes at the end (~~~~). Espresso Addict 18:11, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] References for Lamaload Reservoir

Thanks for the interesting information you have recently added to Lamaload Reservoir. Do you have references for the new material? It's important to provide references for all facts so that the reliability of the encyclopedia is ensured. Thanks. Espresso Addict 18:11, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Roman mythology, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Chris the speller (talk) 19:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] BRCA1

Edit to BRCA1 article dated "11:32, 14 February 2008 193.132.159.169" was by myself. AstarothCY (talk) 11:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pure Reason Revolution

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Please do not use Wikipedia for advertising. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. --Tango (talk) 16:41, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't have the right to remove it, what I have is policy backed by consensus. Promoting the cost and time of ticketing at a gig and greeting those who you anticipate being there is not encyclopedic content. If you are interested in contributing to Wikipedia, you might consider signing up for an account. Thankyou. Regards, WilliamH (talk) 16:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
I noticed there are some statements on the article needing verification. It would be far more fruitful for you to provide citations - that way you will have improved the article, accordingly with information that will remain on it. Just a thought. WilliamH (talk) 16:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
You have just stated why your edit is inappropriate. Please see this. Encyclopedias are not informal. Please seriously consider these messages - you are adding content which veritably has no place here - you can either contribute appropriately or continue on a route which may result in you being blocked from editing here entirely for reasons outlined to you by an administrator. WilliamH (talk) 17:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your final warning. Vandalise any article again and you will be blocked. --Tango (talk) 19:24, 29 February 2008 (UTC)