User talk:193.130.196.1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 193.130.196.1, is registered to ICAP plc, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Thank you for experimenting with the page Meerkat on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. BrianGV 14:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop vandalizing the Convertible bond page. You have been warned. Finnancier 13:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] ICAP

Since you're from ICAP, how about stopping calling my excellent statements biased and instead stop buggering about taking markets for walkies? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.250.228 (talk) 11:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article ICAP (company), you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Onorem♠Dil 16:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Grindelwald has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cometstyles 12:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Rainham, London‎. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. Kbthompson (talk) 15:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Chadwell Heath‎. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kbthompson (talk) 14:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Chadwell Heath‎. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kbthompson (talk) 14:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC)