User talk:193.120.116.177

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] September 2007

Your recent edit to The Marine (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 10:09, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Donald's Quack Attack, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Donald's Quack Attack was changed by 193.120.116.177 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-10-17T18:18:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 18:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Introduction to M-theory. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Noah 19:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Petitionspot, you will be blocked from editing. —Noah 19:26, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


Remember to Provide An Edit Summary
Hello and thank you for your contributions. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Talk:Taoiseach. This helps everyone to understand what is changed. It may be a good idea to set your user preferences (under Editing) to "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary". Thank you.

--LeyteWolfer 17:21, 14 November 2007 (UTC) (talk|contribs)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rice College, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rice College was changed by 193.120.116.177 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-10T19:37:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Rice College. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oni Ookami AlfadorTalk|@ 19:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Rice College, you will be blocked from editing. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 20:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Rice College, you will be blocked from editing. --Oni Ookami AlfadorTalk|@ 20:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 31 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

GlassCobra 20:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ceteris paribus‎ , you will be blocked from editing. Kuru talk 22:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ceteris paribus, you will be blocked from editing. Will (talk) 22:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 56 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Oxymoron83 22:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Kilkenny, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 00:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kilkenny. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Oxymoron83 00:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Legality of cannabis by country, you will be blocked from editing.  —SMALLJIM  21:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  —SMALLJIM  19:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] February 2008

Your recent edit to Silk Road (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 19:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Jamie Maguire constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 20:16, 6 February 2008 (UTC))

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Real Irish Republican Army. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. One Night In Hackney303 01:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Suite Life of Zack & Cody, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: The Suite Life of Zack & Cody was changed by 193.120.116.177 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-14T16:29:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Ian Paisley. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Ayla (talk) 20:54, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Candiru, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- - (User) WolfKeeper (Talk) 00:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Cliff Richard has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Thingg⊕⊗ 00:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Thill sharief do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bbravehost\.com' (link(s): http://gardaraha.bravehost.com/gardaraha.html) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 17:57, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Thill sharief has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Creamy!Talk 18:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Enniscrone, you will be blocked from editing. Hiddenfromview (talk) 17:02, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. Dreadstar † 17:08, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Your recent edit to X-Men (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 19:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Womyn constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Pseudomonas(talk) 19:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Orange (colour). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Pseudomonas(talk) 20:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Mark Chung. Pseudomonas(talk) 20:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 2 weeks from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

GBT/C 20:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Two weeks seems very short, could you ban me for 15 days instead? I think I would have been punished enough for my naughty behaviour then"

Decline reason: "No reason to unblock — Stwalkerster [ talk ] 20:17, 8 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Nonsense request?! I'm requesting not to have my two week block extended to a forever block and you go an delete it? Why was I upgraded to a forever block?"

Decline reason: "It hasn't been extended. Stop abusing this template or your talk page will be protected — Hersfold (t/a/c) 20:28, 8 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Miriam O'Callaghan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ukexpat (talk) 20:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. seicer | talk | contribs 23:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Wtf I asked on that administrator noticeboard to have my talk page unprotected cos the block wore off, and he blocked me for that! Can I be unblocked? I'll be good"

Decline reason: "I'm pretty sure that the reason for the block is that you went back to vandalizing articles after the block, as here and here. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.