Talk:1939 Pacific typhoon season

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1939 Pacific typhoon season article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	1939 Pacific typhoon season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 16, 2007 Good article nominee Listed June 7, 2008 Good article reassessment Kept Current Status: Good article

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.

[edit] Lede problems

Shouldn't the text in the lede be changed to reflect the fact that the JTWC and PAGASA did not exist in 1939? Removing this would leave it fairly empty, and I'm not sure what it should be replaced with. Aside from that, this seems to be pretty close to B-class. --Coredesat 06:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Whoops, that was stupid. OK, I added the correct details. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Looks better now, I've upped it to B-class unless there are any other concerns. --Coredesat 18:39, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Assessment

1. Well written: Its hink, it always passes.
2. Images: Pass
3. Broad: Pass
4. NPOV: Obvious Pass
5. Refs: Pass
6. Accurate: Pass

Well done. Surprised information gets this far back.Mitchazenia 20:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 04:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)