Talk:1931 China floods
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm not sure that 1931 counts as "historic times".
- As in recorded history - not prehistoric times. Warofdreams 10:34, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- It still strikes me as awkward. Maybe "recorded natural disaster" rather than "natural disaster of historic times".
- I say we keep it. I do not find it awkward, but rather an interesting tidbit. --SaulPerdomo
- It still strikes me as awkward. Maybe "recorded natural disaster" rather than "natural disaster of historic times".
it was bad but is over so if you dont like the page wikipedia has writen go write your own or simply look on another website 1931 was over 7 decades ago and id call that history ( histroic ) but then again i dont know 203.59.165.244 06:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC) bella
[edit] So little detail?
Why the heck is this such a small page? If it's the most deadly disaster in human history, why does it have a stub of information?
I find that quite odd... --Mattthemutt 23:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Imaginable canard
The unsourced 10-40millions deadly 1931 Huanghe flood did not really happen.The only verifiable are several majors floods in China of Yangtze river,[[Huai river] but not Huang river,and the death toll is about 400,000 not 40 millions.--Ksyrie(Talkie talkie) 06:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC)