User talk:192.91.75.30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] consensus

To the anonymous user who left a message on my talk page, Hello ;-) Thanks for your post on my talk page. I am sorry you are having a problem reaching a concensus at Porus, and other articles, and I would really like to help out, as "edit wars" (i.e. repeated reverts) are very bad for Wikipedia. You asked for some suggestions on how to resolve the dispute. My first suggestion would be to create an account. Doing so will make discussions a lot easier for everyone involved, especially since you apparently use several IP addresses, which I assume are shared with others? (see Wikipedia:Why create an account? for other benefits associated with an account). I have several other suggestions, but — assuming you will make create an account — I will wait until we can have our discussion on your new user page. Is that ok? Please let me know. Thanks and regards, Paul August 16:33, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

I've replied again Paul August 18:01, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Commercial links

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. --Gareth Hughes 21:34, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning-1

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. dab () 10:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning-2

as an obvious bad faith editor, and obviously a returning banned user, I've blocked your IP range for 24h. If you continue after that, you'll just be blocked again, and again. dab () 12:00, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning-3

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- ImpuMozhi 13:24, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Manassa, Colorado

Your recent edit to Manassa, Colorado (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 15:02, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] December 2006

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Image:DSC02048.JPG. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Krich (talk) 10:23, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Nancy Pelosi, you will be blocked from editing. Loonymonkey 04:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Potluck, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Potluck was changed by 192.91.75.30 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-12-13T20:12:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Piccolo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CapitalR (talk) 09:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)