User talk:192.223.243.6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 192.223.243.6, is registered to Fidelity Investments, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] (Untitled, 1 September 2006)

FYI: 192.223.243.6 is the IP of our corporate firewall, there's a quite a few users behind it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.223.243.6 (talk • contribs) 10:35, 1 September 2006

WHOIS - 192.223.243.6:
OrgName: Fidelity Investments
Address: 82 Devonshire St.
City: Boston
StateProv: MA
PostalCode: 02109
Country: US
NetRange: 192.223.128.0 - 192.223.255.255
.
.
It would appear that by "our corporate firewall" the person means Fidelity Investments. --Charles Gaudette 22:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] (Untitled, 11 April 2005)

Welcome to wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I would like to note, Wikipedia limits content to notable subject matter. Please do not paste in vanity entries. Regards, Lotsofissues 09:19, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] (Untitled, 20 June 2005)

Wikipedia:Tutorial (Keep in mind) describes Wikipedia's policies towards a neutral point of view. Referring to someone as a false prophet is not neutral; likewise, Wikipedia takes no point on which doctrines are damnable or not.--Prosfilaes 21:30, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] User Page Vandalism

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a user's page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Note: I do not stand for vandalism to my user page. If it happens again, you will be reported to admin. Stoneice02 19:00, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Saurav Ganguly

Hello, user at 192.223.243.6. Please stop putting your own personal point of view in the article about Saurav Ganguly. If you keep doing so, you are likely to be blocked from editing. Please read WP:NPOV about writing from a neutral point of view. Thank you.

Stephen Turner 14:07, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dromahane

Love your work on the Dromahane page. Keep up the good work & welcome to Wikipedia! :-) - Ali-oops✍ 17:42, 13 October 2005 (UTC) (from Glantane)

[edit] December 9, 2005

Stop adding misinformation and opinions to articles like Boston Red Sox. Vandalism like that can get you blocked from editing. FreplySpang (talk) 17:58, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] March 6 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Jim Nabors. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. delldot | talk 17:41, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. savidan(talk) (e@) 22:23, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to cystic fibrosis

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Guinnog 16:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rooney vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Budgiekiller 19:15, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Soul theorem on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Rsm99833 17:01, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - regarding: [1] --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 20:28, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Portal:Mathematics/Did you know, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Strom 07:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Woodchuck Draft Cider

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Woodchuck Draft Cider, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Go Futurama! User:Sp3000 05:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Periyar Ramasami, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Khukri (talk . contribs) 19:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Michel Vonk

Your recent edit to Michel Vonk (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Mridangam, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. WHeimbigner 12:25, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Silambarasan Rajendar, you will be blocked. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Pyrospirit Talk Contribs 15:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive. If you vandalize Wikipedia once again, as you did to Silambarasan Rajendar, you will be blocked. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Pyrospirit Talk Contribs 15:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Joseph Vijay. It may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nevhood 18:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Magnolia. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. the_undertow talk 22:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Lorraine, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Katieh5584 17:19, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Diego Corrales on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Farosdaughter 19:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blanking to Talk:Jena, Louisiana

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Wikipedia. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Pedro |  Chat  13:08, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 15:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] www.orlando.bbb.org

Your edits referring to www.orlando.bbb.org were removed from Ayman Ahmed El-Difrawi because the site is dead, according to remover. Strange, because while I have the same problem, it appears to be up in the States. There are very recent seach engine caches of it, too. Can you take a look again and report on the Difrawi talk page? Tx --SooperJoo 15:49, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 17:07, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Lou Pearlman

I appreciate your desire to list all of the man's crimes, but please remember Wikipedia:Undue Weight. We don't need to give exhaustive coverage. Pearlman is a conman, and a large-scale conman, and is morally contemptible and will spend the rest of his life in prison, but we don't need to give every condemnation of his conduct. Also, please do remember citations for some of the material you've added, and try to hold to WP:NPOV a bit more tightly. Michaelbusch 20:07, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

I didn't add to his list of crimes, I added a reference that spoke about the extent and significance of scandal. I was extremely careful to keep NPOV. I don't believe there was undue weight placed on such an extensive crime. I believe this is in keeping with the Wikipedia policy of establishing notability and WP:NPOV. I added citations for the alias I and another editor added. I seriously suggest that you stop just removing stuff you don't like, or you don't think is well cited. I think you are bordering on vandalism. You should ask editors for clarification or citations, or have a conversation without automatically deleting stuff, if they don'tr respond then deletion is in order.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.223.243.6 (talk • contribs)

Per WP:CITE, uncited and potentially contentious material may be removed without consultation. Thank you for adding the references. And please do remember to sign your talk posts. Michaelbusch 20:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Note: I approve heartily of information regarding Pearlman's crimes and scandals, but we need to apply WP:CITE and WP:NPOV even more carefully than usual here. And please don't make false accusations of vandalism. That is a breach of Wikipedia:Etiquette. Michaelbusch 20:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
I don't believe my accusation was false because I said that I considered such deletions vandalism. Furthermore I can find no reference to Wikipedia:Etiquette about accusations of vandalism, if you have one let me know. the original material you deleted was cited and complied with WP:CITE.
Wikipedia:Etiquette does lists suggested steps when you believe something is not written in NPOV:
1. Inquire politely on the article's talk page about aspects of the article you consider non-NPOV (unless they are really egregious), and suggest replacements.
2. If no reply comes, make the substitutions. (Use your watchlist to keep track of what you want to do.)
3. If a reply comes, try to agree about the wording to be used.
I would submit that you should carefully read the Wikipedia policies you are citing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.223.243.6 (talk • contribs)

Again: sign your posts. All it takes is four tildes: ~~~~. I have read the policies. Under Wikipedia:Etiquette, see Wikipedia:Assume good faith. Michaelbusch 21:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ayman Ahmed El-Difrawi

I userfied the contents of the article at User:Shritwod/Ayman Ahmed El-Difrawi (draft) per this request. -- Jreferee t/c 21:20, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from User talk:Stoneice02/SwadhyayParivar. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DéRahier 19:49, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kwsn (Ni!) 16:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Poplin, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Poplin was changed by 192.223.243.6 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-10T16:24:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Swadhyay Movement, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Swadhyay Movement was changed by 192.223.243.6 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-02-14T19:49:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Kukini hablame aqui 19:09, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for a period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  Kukini hablame aqui 06:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Snow has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Antonio Lopez (talk) 22:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Snow constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 22:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC))