User talk:192.197.71.189

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 192.197.71.189, is registered to Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Just a note clarifying the goatse.cx vandalism of the main page on 11/16/04. It has been confirmed via developer access to the Squid logs that this anon was indeed NOT responsible. A different IP address used a User name that was identical to this IP address. This IP address should be considered blameless. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 21:39, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

Yay! I can play in the sandbox again!! 192.197.71.189 21:44, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

bleah :-P

Please stop filling the sandbox. It becomes unusable for others. Fredrik | talk 17:57, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Oak Island

I saw your comments on the Oak Island article and replaced them with a NPOV tag. Can you pop over to the Oak Island talk page and elaborate on what can be done to improve the article? --NormanEinstein 18:12, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

If you have a problem with the Oak Island article please drop by the talk page and elaborate on your position so we can all work together to improve it. In your edits you've said that dissenting opinions and opposing viewpoints are delelted, but you've made no attempt (at least recently) to add anything constructive to the article. I'm not even sure if you think the article slants too much toward stating the treasure as fact or legend. We're willing to listen to your issues with the article if you'd let us. --NormanEinstein 17:39, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I concur with NormanEinstein. Please tell us on the Oak Island talk page what bothers you about the article. I would like to hear your point of view. --JonathanFreed 05:32, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Could you please stop adding your personal disclaimer that you don't agree with the Oak Island article? We've invited you to express your opinions and help to improve the article, but your repeated additions border on vandalism. If you continue this activity you might be banned. --NormanEinstein 18:13, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
Blocked for 24 hours for readding the non-specific note to the top of the Oak Island article, and not using the talk page to detail any problems. Thue | talk 19:06, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

If you wish to dispute the contents of an article, please tag it as NPOV using Template:TotallyDisputed and discuss it on the talk page. You complaints will not be taken seriously unless you participate in the discussion. -Loren 18:56, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

Keep in mind that Wikipedia operates by consensus. If you want an article to improve, you need to collaborate in consensus-building activities. You may argue that the current Oak Island article is factually wrong, or factually correct but presented in a biased way, or both. However, if you don't provide actionable information ("X is incorrect, the correct information is Y", or "I think that saying Z is biased"), it's unreasonable to expect the article to improve (or change at all). Repeatedly inserting a notice at the top of the article is inappropriate: you can insert an appropriate template message (e.g. {{NPOV}}), but then be prepared to state your objection on the article's talk page and to work with other editors on an improved version. If you don't make specific suggestions, someone will likely remove the notice and consider the matter closed. Thanks, and happy editing, --MarkSweep 20:05, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

You've added the same disclaimer to Oak Island article every work day for two weeks in a row. Isn't there something at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada that you could be working on instead of vandalising Wikipedia? --NormanEinstein 16:17, August 19, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ottawa Senators

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ccwaters 20:24, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Afd Notices

Please do not remove Afd notices from articles while the discussion is in progress. --Ezeu 23:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages-- it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. Shell babelfish 17:58, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Paddles

If you are User:Paddles, please login before continuing to edit this userspace. Thank you! DGX 18:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

This person is not me. If you are going to try and have an article deleted for vanity, then (a) be a bit more careful about following the instructions and (b) remember the "vanity" rule applies to articles in the main WP space, not in the User: space. I have never claimed enough notability to have an article in the main article space. Paddles TC 02:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to 4:21. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. hoopydinkConas tá tú? 18:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to 4:21, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tuspm Talk | Contribs | E-Mail Me 18:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Do not put nonsense to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Kaworu Nagisa. It is considered vandalism, and you may be blocked at further attempts. (Wikimachine 01:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC))

[edit] Your edit to Compaq Presario

Your recent edit to Compaq Presario (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:32, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please cite sources

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Lucas Bryant, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 01:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Don't edit other's userpages

As you did at User:Keith Ranville. Wikipedia isn't a messageboard and editing another editor's userpage without their permission is at best impolite and at worst vandalism.--Isotope23 15:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Your post appears to violate WP:LEGAL as well. Don't make legal threats; that is a blockable offense.--Isotope23 15:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] External links

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with links to piano-keyboard-reviews.com (*|search current). Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. Since Wikipedia uses Nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Femto 15:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Image:Ornamental.jpg, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Edokter (Talk) 19:15, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GurIqbal Chahal

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices, as you did with GurIqbal Chahal. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. --Evb-wiki 19:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)GurIqbal Chahal

[edit] July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Todd Skinner, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I'm not sure what you meant by "kkkkkkkkkkkkkkk" but I doubt it was important =) EricTJ 19:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] August 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gardasil. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Gscshoyru 11:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Gardasil and Patrick Sweeney (ice hockey), you will be blocked from editing. • Maurog • 12:01, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gardasil, you will be blocked from editing. Gscshoyru 13:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.—DerHexer (Talk) 13:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Your recent edit to Culture of Costa Rica (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 19:03, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Port Dalhousie, Ontario has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Snowolf How can I help? 14:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Canadian Food Inspection Agency has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 23:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gneiss, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Geologyguy (talk) 19:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)