User talk:192.158.61.140

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Aishwarya Rai, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Yamla 14:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] V-22 Osprey

Please stop adding unsourced POV content. Claims and tech info like you're adding require you to add a supporting reference, and will be removed if not supported by a reference. If the close proximity of components really is a problem, the there will be discussion of it in the industry media. Find that to support your claims. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 14:11, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Last warning

Do not add unsourced information to the article. I understand your desire to counter bias, but adding unsourced information is not acceptable. Also, please do not remove other peoples comments from the talk page. Any further actions in this regard will result in a block. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 18:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

(Copy of my reply to you from my talk page)
You obviously haven't read my comments to you or in the edit summaries. I am not biased, and don't have a problem, in principle, with you adding material on the problems the aircraft has had. As a reader and an occasional contributor to AvWeek myself, I respect what they have to say. My problem with your edits, my only problem with your edits, is that you don't provide any references for the comments you are making. As you are new here, let me make several suggestions: first, register and participate as a registered user. Folks will take you a lot more seriously that way. Second, read WP:V, WP:RS, WP:FN AND WP:CITET. These references will tell you about our requirement to have any contributions properly sourced, and will tell you how to do it. If you have AvWeek references to cite, that's wonderful. Again, my problem wasn't with your comments, it's that they appeared to be your opinion, rather than material that could be sourced.

As for "reputedly", are you sure the source doesn't use that term? Has it been a proven fact? Have folks gone to jail for falsification of documents? Do you have sources? AKRadeckiSpeaketh 20:50, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Indiana State University has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 19:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Skinhead has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 06:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)