User talk:192.118.11.112

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] To whom it may concern

To Whom It May Concern (Mr. Klein himself, perhaps?):

Wikipedia is not a PR site. Please stop deleting the "Controversies" section. It is accurate, and you have offered no evidence that it is not.

If you continue to do so, I will refer this article for deletion as violation of Wikipedia's no-advertising policy.

[edit] www.4byte.co.il, added without any comment ?

Hello 192.118.11.112. What is this link www.4byte.co.il that you keep adding, without any comment? In my browser it just recurses back to the Floating point article. Doesn't that happen for you as well? In any case, please discuss any proposed links on the Talk:Floating point discussion page to ensure they are valuable before adding them. See WP:WPSPAM for the reasons behind this proposal. Thank you. EdJohnston 17:55, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. — Nearly Headless Nick {L} 14:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] How to sign your comments

Hello 192.118.11.112. We are pleased that you have decided to join the discussion on Talk:Aaron Klein. When you contribute there, note that you can sign your comment by leaving four tildes, like ~~~~.   EdJohnston 01:51, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Single purpose accounts

The seven user/IPs on this list have been primarily or exclusively single-purpose accounts used for editing only one article, Aaron Klein. More than one editor is quite certain that all of these accounts have been and/or are used by the subject himself.

Every image ever placed in the article has been uploaded by one or more of these user/IPs. Every such image has been obtained from World Net Daily. All have persistently added add far more external links to that single site than Wikipedia consensus deems appropriate.

All of these user/IPs have repeatedly violated key Wikipedia policies and Wikipedia guidelines, several of which are here referenced in two excerpts:

[edit] Conflict of interest

A Wikipedia conflict of interest is an incompatibility between the purpose of Wikipedia to produce a neutral encyclopedia and the individual agendas or aims of editors who are involved with the subject of an article.

This includes promotion of oneself or other individuals, causes, organizations, and companies you work for, and their products, as well as suppression of negative information, and criticism of competitors.

If you have a conflict of interest, you should:

  1. avoid editing articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  2. avoid breaching relevant policies on autobiographies and neutrality
  3. avoid participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  4. avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your corporation in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
↑ Excerpted from Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

[edit] Disruptive editing

This guideline concerns gross, obvious and repeated violations of fundamental policies, not subtle questions about which reasonable people may disagree. A disruptive editor is an editor who:

  • Is tendentious: continues editing an article or group of articles in pursuit of a certain point for an extended time despite opposition from one or more other editors.
  • Rejects community input: resists moderation and/or requests for comment, continuing to edit in pursuit of a certain point despite an opposing consensus from impartial editors and/or administrators.

In addition, such editors may:

  • Campaign to drive away productive contributors: violate other policies and guidelines such as Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:No personal attacks, Wikipedia:Ownership of articles, engage in sockpuppetry, meatpuppetry, etc. on a low level that might not exhaust the general community's patience, but that operates toward an end of exhausting the patience of productive rules-abiding editors on certain articles.
↑ Excerpted from Wikipedia:Disruptive editing

[edit] Additional sockpuppet

See also Wikipedia:Sock puppetry 13:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Questions

→ See also: Wikipedia:Single purpose account.

If you have questions about these policies and how they pertain to your edits, please post them on the article talk page, Talk:Aaron Klein. — Athænara ✉ 19:53, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] COI compliance

Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance is recommended reading with regard to your use of an anonymous COI SPA IP address for disruptive editing of the Aaron Klein bio. 01:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Friendly warning

If your tendentious editing (removal of citations and their format, adding a quote from a gossip column, etc.) continues, it's likely to be reported on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents with a request for a user block on the account(s) you use. — Athaenara ✉ 01:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated., for disruptive editing Rlevse 15:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)


Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I'm going to unblock to allow you to register an account and will them reapply the block to cover the previous disruptive editing from this ip. I will reset the block to allow registered accounts to continue to edit from this ip. Please indicate on this page as soon as you have registered the account so I know its safe to reblock

Request handled by: Spartaz Humbug! 18:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry if I am doing this wrong, but I tried to understand all your instructions but I admit I am not very good at this. I am not Aron Kein, though I noticed my IP address shows I have made frequent editings to his page. I have only made changes to the site containing my bio that some people have continuously made inaccurate corrections to. I will sign up with a user id so you can differentiate between me and whomever this klein guy is. I wasn't even the person who put my bio on wikipedia in the first place. But since it is already here I want it to be accurate - for example I do not live in Gilo, and haven't for 6 years!!! yet someone has continuously edited this just so they can push the point that Gilo is an illegal settlement etc. I also never served with the Shabak or Mossad, but someone added that nonsense to my bio. Also there is no investigation being conducted against me and this blogger who compiled a "damning" list of accusations against me never checked to see what the truth was or gave me an opportunity to respond. These things are irrelevent to my bio for people looking me up. I would therefore kindly request that the block be removed because I have not abused the system and would not do so because I think this project is very important and useful for the public. And I have never edited any other entry but the one I believe I have more knowledge about than any one else - myself (46 years of - though my wife thinks she knows me better!)

Please bear with us - I'm checking with the blocking admin. Spartaz Humbug! 17:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)


I have registered - thank you for your consideration and help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Giladraz (talk • contribs) 18:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. I have set a soft block so edits by registered users should be possible. Please let me know if you need further help with any autoblocks by using another unblock template. Spartaz Humbug! 18:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Additions of http://.beyondsecurity.com

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.--Hu12 (talk) 17:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)