User talk:190.10.0.64

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP may result in an extended block.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 22:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] May 2007

Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did to Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go!. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --TREYWiki 00:18, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chickyfuzz14(user talk) 03:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Doctor of Philosophy (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED! 13:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED! 13:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE Overlinking

Please do not add irrelevant links to articles. I focus your attention to the manual of style. Specifically,

“ What generally should not be linked

In general, do not create links to:

  • Plain English words.
  • Subsidiary topics that result in red links (links that go nowhere) to articles that will never be created, such as the names of book chapters.
  • The same link multiple times, because redundant links clutter up the page and make future maintenance harder. It is not uncommon to repeat a link that had last appeared much earlier in the article, but there's hardly ever a reason to link the same term twice in the same section.
  • Individual words when a phrase has its own article. For example, link to "the flag of Tokelau" instead of "the flag of Tokelau". Such a link is more likely to be interesting and helpful to the user, and almost certainly contains links to the more general terms, in this case, "flag" and "Tokelau".
  • A page that redirects back to itself. These circular redirects are frustrating to readers.
  • Words in a disambiguation entry other than to the disambiguation target itself. The general rule is "one link per entry"; additional links tend to confuse the reader.


 ”

G.A.S 08:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Why the hell do you change colors of infoboxes?! Bright colors don't look good. Go look at Sailor Moon characters' articles and see what is used there.

Please bother to answer this question. I said - look at SM articles, they don't use bright colors!

[edit] Please stop

Please stop changing the colors of the userboxes of Tokyo Mew Mew's characters. Also stop reverting our changes as it could result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your violating the three revert rule. — G.A.S 14:37, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] June 2007

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive or hard to read formatting, as you did to Mint Aizawa, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ninja! 16:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ichigo Momomiya. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. G.A.S 16:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Dear 190.10.0.64. As a result of your reversions to Zakuro Fujiwara, I have reported you at Administration noticeboard for 3RR violation. G.A.S 20:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 18 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule on Zakuro Fujiwara. In the future, please solve editing disputes through discussion rather than edit warring. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Heimstern Läufer (talk) 20:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED! 04:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Zakuro Fujiwara, you will be blocked from editing. G.A.S 06:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Rather discuss the changes at the appropriate talk pages — G.A.S 06:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED! 04:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

You have been reported to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED! 12:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 31 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Ryan Postlethwaite 12:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED! 23:37, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Once again, you have been reported to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED! 02:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for vandalism of Wikipedia

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 02:43, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED! 19:12, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Ichigo Momomiya, you will be blocked from editing. G.A.S 20:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Once again, you have been reported to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. You seriously need stop. THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED! 02:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. 夢の騎士Yume no Kishi - Talk 14:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Please do not change the colour of the infoboxes in articles, as you have done with a number of characters' articles already. —C.Fred (talk) 01:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of three months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Daniel Case 01:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)