User talk:172.164.199.13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] December 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia talk:Babel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gscshoyru (talk) 17:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Reply

How is it vandalism? 172.164.199.13 (talk) 17:32, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop replacing your comments -- they're removed as the comments of an indef blocked user -- I know you're the same person as before. Gscshoyru (talk) 17:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Well why do they have to be removed? Can you prove your alligations? 172.164.199.13 (talk) 17:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
They're removed for the same reasons they were before, which I've already stated. And there's no other reason for you to replace them. Gscshoyru (talk) 17:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)


I'm sorry but those reasons were not told to me. 172.164.199.13 (talk) 17:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
They're the edits of a indef blocked user. That means you can't edit. Gscshoyru (talk) 18:09, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia talk:Babel, you will be blocked from editing. Gscshoyru (talk) 18:09, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
And where in Wikipedia policy does it say that about my edits? Also would you stop with the annoying subst: ed templates? You are going to block me either way aren't you? 172.164.199.13 (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
See WP:EVADE Gscshoyru (talk) 18:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
"An administrator may reset the block of a user who intentionally evades a block, and may extend the duration of the block if the user engages in further blockable behaviour while evading the block. User accounts or IP addresses used to evade a block may also be blocked." Ok, um, that says nothing about reverting edits. 172.164.199.13 (talk) 18:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Addhoc (talk) 18:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock request

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I would like to point out that I am actually doing the opposite of vandalism and that Gscshoyru is actually doing the vadalism, examples soon to follow. 172.164.199.13 (talk) 18:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "Apparent sockpuppet of PatPeter. – Luna Santin (talk) 04:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

172.164.199.13 (talk) 18:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

(I've edited the block reason to clarify you were blocked for disruption, instead of vandalism.--Addhoc (talk) 18:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC))

Its not disruption by me it is disruption by Gscshoyru, he is the one vandalizing pages! 172.164.199.13 (talk) 18:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Please tell me in more detail, citing Wikipedia policy if you have to, how I am being disruptive. 172.164.199.13 (talk) 18:44, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
You have made no constructive edits to building a reliable encyclopedia, while you have started arguments. Addhoc (talk) 18:52, 27 December 2007 (UTC)