User talk:172.148.159.236
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] July 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Break Machine. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Talmage 22:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
[edit] Break Machine
I would suggest you watch your tone. You are more than welcome to point out mistakes in a civil tone. See WP:Civility. I apologize if the revert was not justified, however, considering there are more than 100 edits per minute by people without registered accounts (the edits I'm currently monitoring) sometimes revision that aren't vandalism get flagged as such. It happens because it would be impossible to read every single edit to Wikipedia. In the event something is inappropriately rollbacked, it can always be corrected, and you would do well to simple tell me on my talk page, instead of invoking a hostile tone. You should also consider registering an account, since edits my registered users typically undergo more scrutiny before being rolled back. Talmage 22:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- I will not watch my tone. You didn't do something you expected me to do. You also apply a two tier system. It doesn't matter whether I am editing anonymously or with a sign in name. An edit should be judged on its merits, not whether it is anon or not. I am annoyed and not going to hide it.
- That is not a two tiered system. I monitor pages most likely to be vandalized. Particularly I am looking at changes made by anonymous users. I monitor around 100 changes per minute. Unfortunately it is simply not humanly possible to review every edit and mistakes happen. However I have had two complaints in the last 250 reverts I've made. When it happens, all you need to do is add a civil note (once again I refer you to WP:Civility) on my talk page, and I will correct any mistake I have made, if necessary. You are not required to register an account; I am merely stating that your edits are going to be less likely to be incorrectly flagged as vandalism if you do use an account. Once again, I apologize that it is not humanly possible to review 100 edits per minute with the detail we would both like. Talmage 22:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- I will not watch my tone. You didn't do something you expected me to do. You also apply a two tier system. It doesn't matter whether I am editing anonymously or with a sign in name. An edit should be judged on its merits, not whether it is anon or not. I am annoyed and not going to hide it.
[edit] Welcome
Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
Here are some other hints and tips:
- I would recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
- When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.
If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} on this talk page and a user will help you as soon as possible. I will answer your questions as far as I can. Again, welcome, and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. - Talmage 22:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orientacion (Prison Break episode)
The article is proposed for deletion because it does not follow the guidelines of Wikipedia:Notability. The episode has not been aired nor has any official information (i.e. press release from FOX) of the episode been released. Aside from the premiere date, the article cites the source from a fan site for its summary. There were no additional information (on production etc.) other than the summary. Had the source been reliable, the summary still does not warrant the standalone article for the episode as the short summary should be then merged into the List of Prison Break episodes article. That is why the article is proposed for deletion.
If other TV episode articles do not follow the guidelines of Wikipedia:Notability, then yes, they will also be proposed for deletion.
Regards, Ladida 01:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |