User talk:168.9.210.14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 168.9.210.14, is registered to Georgia Department of Education and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Thank you for experimenting with the page List of people by name: Brown on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
--Jerzy•t 17:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Heightened Vigilance Request

_ _ I urge heightened vigilance for this account's edits, in light of the vandalism ratio and the full-month survival of one vandalistic edit.
_ _ This IP address has been used for 8 editing sessions, of which 6 [I will recount in light of a subsequent moment of clarity.] were clear instances of vandalism (and one was a presumably honest bad editing judgment). The subject matter of several sessions suggests its contributor may be associated with an Atlanta-area school, perhaps Clark Atlanta University, suggesting it may be a shared IP associated with that school (and thus that the pattern of edits will not offer a profile of a single editor), a possibility that others may wish to pursue in the usual fashion.
_ _ I also note the use of 68.219.7.3 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log), primarily for vandalism thematically similar (i.e., presumably fake or n-n alums) to some of this vandalism. It may be another shared IP, used by the vandal (or one of the several vandals) using this one.<br>--Jerzy•t 17:58 &21:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
I erred in including the 'graph i have just struck out, directly above. The resemblances reflect common subject-area interest, and there is no vandalism by the other editor, User:68.219.7.3. (I misunderstood the other editor's citation of 1996 graduation date as a birth year, indicating a sub-teen which would have paralleled several LoPbN entries (mentioned above) by this talk page's IP user, covering teenaged athletes.)
--Jerzy•t 21:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • New count on IP's contribs: 7 (not 8) edit sessions. With the most recent first:
  1. 2 articles, both changed by replacing legitimate existing entries with teenage athletes;
  2. legitimate existing material replaced by utter nonsense & abusive PoV;
  3. plausible alum entry (wikified by next contrib, another IP);
  4. 2 articles, both apparently well-meant edits;
  5. insertion of peripheral, all-caps, abusive PoV;
  6. "New Orleans" added, outside any sentence and without any sign of attempting to understand what role in article its placement would give it;
  7. vanity and attack entries for birthdays of 3 15-year-olds.
I construe these as 4 sessions of vandalism (in italics); 1 careless at best; and 2 presumably responsible contributions; besides miscounting the total edits, i had previously construed as vandalism one of the responsible contribs.
--Jerzy•t 08:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

LoPbN is not abt unknown teens, but encyclopedically notable people, and even additions of those must not remove existing, legitimate entries. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to List of people by name: Ol-Oo. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
--Jerzy•t 20:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Water (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Water

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Water, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. User:Zoe|(talk) 17:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page United Nations on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. The Rambling Man 19:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Magna Carta, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Tellyaddict 17:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your Edits to United Nations

Your edits to United Nations have been removed. Again. (diff) If I had the power to, I would block you. But I can't block you and when I try to report vandals, no one pays attention. I could make more threats, but who cares? You'll end up getting blocked and your edits will be reverted. There's no point to vandalism. Why would you want to hurt a not-for-profit, educational enterprise like Wikipedia? You may think it's fun, but in reality it's just plain mean. Please stop. If you want to make "fun" edits, go to Uncyclopedia. It's a really fun place to edit. Good luck in life. Have a nice Valentine's Day! --Think Fast 17:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Clayton High School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dadude3320 14:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Talk:Deodorant, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Marlith T/C 00:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Chickpea, you will be blocked from editing. Smilesfozwood 19:45, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sparta, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sparta was changed by 168.9.210.14 (c) (t) deleting 17247 characters on 2007-12-03T15:53:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 15:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sparta, you will be blocked from editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 15:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Main Page, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Talk:Main Page was changed by 168.9.210.14 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-01-16T20:26:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:26, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Racial segregation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tiddly-Tom 18:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Gettysburg Battlefield has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 13:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hundred Years' War, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hundred Years' War was changed by 168.9.210.14 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-02-07T16:19:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Hundred Years' War constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Sam Korn (smoddy) 16:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC))

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Digable Planets. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ascidian (talk) 16:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mark Dean, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mark Dean was changed by 168.9.210.14 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-26T19:56:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mark Dean, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mark Dean was changed by 168.9.210.14 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-18T14:33:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to North Clayton High School, you will be blocked from editing. JSpung (talk) 14:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Network, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:31, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor was changed by 168.9.210.14 (u) (t) deleting 35336 characters on 2008-04-15T14:49:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:49, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to North Clayton High School (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 16:39, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to North Clayton High School (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 16:39, 25 April 2008 (UTC)