User talk:168.209.97.34

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Warnings

Note: Remember to always substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | interiot's tool | page moves | block log | block list]
Older messages for this IP address have been hidden. See the page history.


[edit] Please note comment on shared IP address

168.209.97.34 is a proxy server for one of South Africa's largest ISPs

Keep in mind that 168.209.97.34 is a transparent shared proxy server used by the largest ISP in South Africa. As you can tell by the different writing styles of user:168.209.97.34 not all edits were done by the same user.

[edit] Regarding edits made during November 29, 2006 (UTC) to Jack London

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. MER-C 10:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 1 December 2006

The edit you made to Montessori method (this revision) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. If you are interested in making useful contributions, see the welcome page and the introduction to editing. However, please do not continue to vandalise pages; such edits will be reverted and you will be blocked from further editing – Gurch 23:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edit(s) to the article: Woodworking joints

You have recently vandalized a Wikipedia article, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. // I c e d K o l a 22:28, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to October 9

Please do not add yourself or anyone else without a Wikipedia article to the Wikicalendar pages. To have an article, a person must meet the criteria outlined in WP:BIO. Thank you. Fabricationary 17:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Last warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you blank a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Fire Star 火星 18:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 18th January 2007

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Bad Attitude. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Sharonlees 09:15, 18 January 2007 (UTC)


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. You may also be interested in reading The five pillars of Wikipedia, our Help pages, the Tutorial, the policy on citing sources, and our Manual of Style.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Luna Santin 09:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Dave Meltzer, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Sharonlees 10:49, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] vandalism

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Crocadog 17:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] April 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Charlize Theron, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:47, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Christopher Wren, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.- Gilliam 17:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Car tuning do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Dirk Beetstra T C 22:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your only warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Social entrepreneurship, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia and other sites that use the MediaWiki spam blacklist at all. --Dirk Beetstra T C 22:48, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Hi, the recent edit you made to Infiltration (HVAC) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Gurchzilla 11:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello. If you want to add someone to Category:South African guitarists, you need to do one of two things. Option 1: Find an existing article on that person and add [[Category:South African guitarists]] (better yet, "South African jazz guitarists", or "classical", or "rock", or whatever - if this creates a "red" category at the bottom, don't panic, give me a shout on my talk page and I'll take a look. Option 2 Get an account and write an article about that person - you have to log in to create new article/category pages - and then add your chosen category at the bottom. Again, give me a shout if you think I can help. The method you chose, adding a name to the category page directly, doesn't work in the same way. Best wishes, Bencherlite 23:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Invention. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Edcolins 18:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Religious architecture, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eliz81 10:12, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Virus, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Sengkang 13:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Image:Stickwalkav.gif. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cheers, Lights 12:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Globe Theatre, you will be blocked from editing. MER-C 12:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning.

Thank you for experimenting with the page Konk on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. cholmes75 (chit chat) 13:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Nuclear power. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Closedmouth 13:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Your recent edits

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:William Kentridge, you will be blocked from editing. —Wknight94 (talk) 14:38, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to William Kentridge (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For future editing tests use the sandbox. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Redirect of Swamp of Sorrows

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Swamp of Sorrows, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Swamp of Sorrows is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Swamp of Sorrows, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tom Sotis

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tom Sotis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Tom Sotis. RogueNinjatalk 17:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Tom Sotis

An editor has nominated Tom Sotis, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Sotis and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)