User talk:167.230.38.115

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 167.230.38.115, is registered to American International Group, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. For one thing, if you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

[edit] Permission to use aerial image of City of London

Dear Bossi: I'd like to your image of the aerial view of City of London (with the "egg" building in the center) for my company AIG's employee publication, Contact, for one time use only in the December issue. The quarterly publication is mailed free to all employees and not commercially sold to outside entities.

What do I need to do to use the image -- in jpg format and in at least 300 dpi resolution? Do you send me the image separately? As you can see, I'm a new user and my questions are that of a novice, so pelase pardon my ignorance. Thank you.

Regards, Stentorian 17:23, 17 September 2007
This comment posted by IP 167.230.38.115

Sounds good! There is no issue with using the image with a free publication so long as it is attributed: anything along the lines of "Image provided by Andrew Bossi" or something of that nature. To save the image, just follow this link, right-click on the image, and left-click on "Save Image". That is the best-quality aerial image I have available, so hopefully it fits your needs for the publication. If that's the wrong image, just locate the correct one and do the same thing -- all my images within my gallery generally have the same licenses, but you're welcome to contact me if you have any additional questions or concerns. Thanks for checking! --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 01:05, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Abuse contact

Michael McKoy

Senior Network Administrator
AIG Network Support

  • 800-334-9641 ext 38386
  • Mike.McKoy at AIG.com

[edit] Warnings

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | interiot's tool | page moves | block log | block list]

[edit] June 2007

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. It appears you have not followed this policy at Nimrod (Bible). Please always observe our core policies. --Tλε Rαnδоm Eδιτоr 15:12, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  2. Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Olivia Newton-John. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Katieh5584 22:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
  3. This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Olivia Newton-John, you will be blocked from editing. Evilclown93(talk) 18:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  4. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to University of Dayton Ghetto, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Newsboy85 03:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  5. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Minissha Lamba. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. :) Chetblong 19:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

  1. Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Stock market index. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Bart133 (t) (c) 20:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

  1. Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Raymond Arritt 06:35, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
  2. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dane Cook, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dane Cook was changed by 167.230.38.115 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-08-21T15:06:50+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 19:07, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Norman Hsu, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ronnotel 18:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Jumper (song) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 18:06, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Yo, don't you people in the insurance business have something better to do with your day? Chubbles 20:09, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] October 2007

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Bradeos Graphon 20:59, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Young Rome. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ≈Alessandro ♫ T • C 19:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Count Basie, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Russ (talk) 19:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Syntel. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Geniac (talk) 14:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tim Sylvia, you will be blocked from editing. Tuckdogg (talk) 21:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 h in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Sandstein (talk) 21:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Carlos Manzano - New York City, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Carlos Manzano - New York City was changed by 167.230.38.115 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2008-01-08T21:14:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for experimenting with the page Keith McCants, and for reverting your edits. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In the future, please do not experiment on article pages; instead, use the sandbox. Thank you. —LOL (talk) 22:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Keith McCants. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 17:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Queer Eye, you will be blocked from editing. Otto4711 (talk) 18:52, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Fez Whatley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cenarium (talk) 17:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to August 3, you will be blocked from editing. --Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 17:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Kingturtle (talk) 18:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Recession has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. GtstrickyTalk or C 16:47, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Computer software, you will be blocked from editing. BigDunc (talk) 21:42, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] April 2008

get a life and stop vandalizing pages —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.10.89.3 (talk) 16:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tank. Your edits constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Trekphiler (talk) 23:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to BaD Radio Show has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Thingg⊕⊗ 23:16, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Roti. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In the future, please do not experiment on article pages; instead, use the sandbox. Thank you. ... richi (hello) 23:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. ... richi (hello) 23:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] May 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Rapido (talk) 08:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to PlayStation, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Useight (talk) 16:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC)