User talk:167.219.88.140

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] August 2005

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia - your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Canderson7 21:37, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, use the sandbox. --Canderson7 21:52, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please do any testing here. --Canderson7 22:04, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] September 2005

Your edit to User:Street Scholar's userpage was clear cut vandalism. While this may be a public computer at Deloitte & Touche, you have been warned before and I won't warn you again. If you commit another act of vandalism, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fernando Rizo T/C 16:17, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Your edits to the Jim Gerlach page on 12 September was once again clear cut vandalism. I think that should be the end of it. Note: I'm a Lois Murphy supporter, but vandalizing the Gerlach page is not acceptable. jesup 03:40, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] January 2006

  • Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Pattersonc(Talk) 12:41 PM, Tuesday; January 31 2006 (EST)

[edit] June 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Green-and-black Streamertail. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. SCHZMO ✍ 16:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] August 2006

Your recent edit to Clan Campbell (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 15:19, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Steve Irwin. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Casper2k3 20:39, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Steve Irwin, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. —Whomp (myedits) 20:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] January 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Pit Bull. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:36, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from NCAA Division I-A national football championship. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.- Gilliam 20:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Your recent edit to Grace University (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 20:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

I've nominated Pakistani pop music, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Pakistani pop music satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistani pop music and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Pakistani pop music during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ~ Wikihermit 05:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hampton Bays, New York, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. utcursch | talk 17:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] October 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to WTTG, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial 20:55, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to WTTG, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial 20:57, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this IP address will be subject to a longer block.

bibliomaniac15 A straw poll on straw polls 21:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Hi, the recent edit you made to Defeasance has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 02:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Shanghai, you will be blocked from editing. --Nlu (talk) 02:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Your recent edit to Ryan Braun (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Ryan Braun constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 20:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC))

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of top 500 Major League Baseball home run hitters, you will be blocked from editing. Wildthing61476 (talk) 21:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Question

This is a shared IP and everything you see above has nothing to do with me. If I log in and this IP happens to be banned, can I still edit under my username? {{help}}

I think so, but I'm not sure. Also, it may depend on the type of block. See Wikipedia:Blocking. Maybe someone else will come along with a better answer. --Coppertwig (talk) 23:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
It does depend on the type of block. Your block log is located here. If you are blocked from editing without being logged in, check that page for the following:
  • anon only means that only unregistered users are blocked. If you are able to log in to an existing account, you will be able to edit.
  • account creation blocked means that you will not be able to register a new account. You will need to log in from another IP address in order to make an account, log in, and continue to edit.
  • autoblock should not apply to an IP address, but this blocks all IP's that are used by a blocked account.
The usual options set for an IP block are the first two - this allows users who already have an account to continue to edit, but prevents IP vandals from creating an account to continue their disruption. Unfortunately, it will also keep you from making constructive edits. I'd recommend making an account now, while you still can, if you wish to continue editing constructively. Hersfold (t/a/c) 23:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Eris (dwarf planet), you will be blocked from editing. Steve Crossin (talk) 14:25, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] March 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Oldest people, you will be blocked from editing.  Channel R.   18:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Oldest people, you will be blocked from editing.  Channel R.   18:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mike Jones (wrestler), you will be blocked from editing. Harland1 (t/c) 22:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Filing cabinet. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 21:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 21:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Jon Lester (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 13:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Jobber (fuel) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. treelo talk 19:17, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Polygamy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tan | 39 15:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.