User talk:165.21.155.115

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notice to Editors:
This IP may be immediately reported to the Administrators without any warnings
This IP has been repeatedly used to vandalise multiple articles in Wikipedia in response to past abuse of editing privileges and, as such, does not require any further warnings when it is again being used to abuse Wikipedia. Further abuse from this IP may result in an
immediate and extended block.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log
Attention:

This IP address, 165.21.155.115, is registered to SingNet, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Indus Valley Civilization has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Ikki Tousen has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cometstyles 13:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Sammul Chan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Abrech (talk) 18:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Barney & Friends. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 02:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] May 2008

Hi Sysops,

I, fireblaster_lyz, have difficulties editing Wikipedia articles on BEMANI related information. Can my block be lifted? Thanks. Fireblaster lyz (talk) 16:32, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Goal! 3. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Aleenf1 08:20, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Lubin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Closedmouth (talk) 08:30, 5 June 2008 (UTC)