User talk:165.21.154.117

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notice to Editors:
This IP may be immediately reported to the Administrators without any warnings
This IP has been repeatedly used to vandalise multiple articles in Wikipedia in response to past abuse of editing privileges and, as such, does not require any further warnings when it is again being used to abuse Wikipedia. Further abuse from this IP may result in an
immediate and extended block.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log
Attention:

This IP address, 165.21.154.117, is registered to SingNet, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

[edit] Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

[edit] February 2008

  1. Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:165.21.154.111 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cometstyles 11:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to David Archuleta, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Thank you. —BradV 18:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Reader's Digest, you will be blocked from editing. Thingg⊕⊗ 14:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cockfight. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 02:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cockfight. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 02:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cockfight. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 02:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. Hi, the recent edit you made to Soviet Union has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will (talk) 17:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Voltaire has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Ale_Jrbtalk 10:51, 2 March 2008 (UTC)