User talk:159.105.80.141
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Antisemitism
Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Antisemitism. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. --Sefringle 04:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Please give me a hint as to what I said - not able to find it ( you must have a copy). Thanks.If you are looking for personal attacks, I believe you will find several that precede any comment I make - though I usually try to shot down their arguments instead. You can paste my comment that seemed to hurt someones feelings here if possible.
[edit] Personal attacks
With regards to your comments on 9/11 conspiracy theories: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. I am referring to this comment. Thank you--Dcooper 13:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Talk page usage
Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Duesberg hypothesis for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. MastCell Talk 15:58, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Talk pages again
Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Andre Chad Parenzee for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. MastCell Talk 20:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your talk page comments
Hello. Please take a look at the talk page guidelines. Article talk pages are intended solely to coordinate improvement of the related article. They are not a forum for general discussion, rumination, argumentation, or for your musings on Holocaust denialism, AIDS denialism, "trivia", etc. A brief review of your contributions reveals a long-standing abuse of the talk pages and no article contributions. Please contribute constructively, according to the talk page guidelines, or seek another forum. At this point, given the long-standing nature of the abuse, I'm going to block this IP address if the abuse continues. MastCell Talk 16:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] IP blocked
No problem with a block - gives me time to read up on some stuff. On your advise to contribute to an article, I believe it would be called something ( vandalism?)- don't you agree? Can't figure exactly which comment caused the upset ( The Tomb of ... maybe?), the poppers article, ..... probably just not agreeing with most of the current pet ideas ( I'm shakist on global warming but getting more and more convinced evey day. ) Don't you like the ad hominem of wiki - I've been accused, once I was guilty ( I got frustrated at a blatant lie and deception, but I wouldn't again I hope ), but I think I am more ad hominened against than the ad hominener ). Browsing the editorss pages/comments it appears they seem to dislike the ideas but have a hard time finding a problem ( Do they really think you can cremate a body with it's own fat? This item was finally removed from the article ( Holocaust I think ) but I noticed that it has crept back in ( less prominent but still they wont giveup on Vrba even though Hilberg thinks he is nuts "unreliable". ) I hope that a link to a modern cremation site can clear up the science and facts - however I doubt it ever makes the main article ( which seems immune from the intrusion of science ). I could go on with many more - I always assumed that the talk page was to talk about the subject - not the grammar, etc - If only the same ideas are wanted then maybe the talk pages are redundant - at least on what appears to be politically charged issues. I'll write to Jimbo in a few weeks to see his opinion. Well, good luck - hope it's not too hot out there.159.105.80.141 19:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:01, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Belzec extermination camp, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Crazy Boris with a red beard (talk) 20:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
[edit] Ongoing use of talk pages
Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Peter Duesberg for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. MastCell Talk 20:11, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Peter Duesberg for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MastCell Talk 23:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked, again
If wiki was a serious endeavor then most/many of the editors/admins would be canned - I suspect Jimbo knows he has goofs on board - Fat causing the entire incineration of 1 much less millions. I know lots of fat women - men too - and I have yet to hear of even one - in all history - exploding into flame, even after death in a house... fire. I don't know if you are trying to be humorous or if this is really their level of competence. If they can cite the fat cremation thing go ahead - their "reliable" sources have been called unreliable by other of their "reliable" sources ( when a person finds one of these they are within minutes of being banned ( it must really rancle goofs to only have the power to ban - sounds like a bunch of not too bright kids on the playground)). PS The entire structure of your history... articles smells more of propaganda than information. The Duesberg articles are particularly embarrassing - not being able to even get partway through one of his points without starting to foam at the mouth is starting to become a hallmark of wiki. Keep it up - best way.only way to kill the project is by insiders. It's actually fun to watch - fat ladies are watching your every move, and laughing( good exercize).159.105.80.141 (talk) 19:56, 7 March 2008 (UTC)PS Flatearthers and tinfoil hatters are in a closely related group to the spontaneous burning fat lady crowd - don't agree too much with them, except out of kindness, for fear that you might be grouped with the tinfoil hatters yourself. PSPS It must be troubling - you ban for it - to know that the holocaust stands on such shaky legs ( burning fat ladies - at least I have to give you credit of knowing where the weak - but essentail points are). I hope you do know that "no holes no holocaust" is no more essential than " burning fat ladies.. ie there was nowhere near enough fuel to cremate that many people without the "burning fat ladies". I had always hoped that the technical impossibilities would influence some, but I keep hearing the "soap" story making its rounds every so often so I guess the "some" that can handle science are readily replaced with "some" others who have trouble with numbers and books.
[edit] Back again
Your first edit back from your block was to make a personal attack on the admin who blocked you. That is not a good sign. You know that incivility, especially aimed towards other users, is not tolerated here on wikipedia. If you continue to make disruptive comments on talk pages, you will be blocked. You have been blocked in the past for this same offense, so consider this your only warning. -Andrew c [talk] 14:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Sorry Andrewc - I was searching the web to see if others were having the same trouble as I. It appears they are - and from exactly the same crowd of editors etc - with occasionally a new one thrown in ( why?). The comment you must be addressing was on a talk page of someone I never heard of befor _ Fleet* something I believe. You appear to even be monitoring somewhat private talk pages. Wiki is more of a joke than I suspected - of course being able to control the information that the public sees on issues is probsably far more important/powerful than I even imagine. PS The burning fat ladies thing has got to go - there must be someway to counter this BS. The vast majority( love that phrase - lifted it from the Irving section ) of real historians are ganging up on you, of course not too many physicists think kerosene melts steel either, or the sun is a minor player in climate ( have you noticed how the tone of global warming has mellowed lately - could it be me - I doubt it too)... it is now 8:50 please put down the time your software got word of this missive Thanks
[edit] IP blocked
Due to persistent vandalism (see edit log), editing by anonymous users from your school, library or institution's IP address may be currently disabled. You continue to have full access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address is probably also disabled.
If editing is required for class projects, please have your teacher or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may email us using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. An account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken.
Thank you.
Isn't it galling to see how few people bother with wiki - can you really afford to block the few that do?
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |