User talk:158.80.8.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 158.80.8.2, is registered to Baker College and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Just to forwarn everyone, this is a public computer's IP address at a college in Michigan. If any comments or odd things happen, please don't ban the address. Thanks.  :D

Contents

[edit] Everybody's a critic

Your edits to the main Jehovah's Witnesses page were out of context, in that there is already a page dedicated to Charles Taze Russell. Your exhaustive points should go there, and not in the main article, which is already nearly bursting at the seams.

You're certainly welcome to provide verifiable independent sources for your case per the Wikipedia policies WP:NOR, WP:VERIFY, WP:CITE, and WP:NPOV. Be careful to be objective, even with such a strong viewpoint as yours. and above all, don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. I hope you can present your case without lacing it with your own slant.

Happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony 21:07, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Just a note

You recently posted a question/comment on User:Sango123 (diff). You'd be better served by posting it on her talk page, User talk:Sango123. That said, Sango hasn't been active all month, so don't expect a quick response. EVula 19:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Justice

Hi. You added a comment about an RfA to the above article. Articles are not the place for this sort of thing: try the user talk-pages of people you think might be interested. Yours, Sam Clark 20:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

1. I said Talk pages, not user pages (yours is this page, User Talk:158.80.8.2, for instance); 2. I said 'people you think might be interested' - why would you imagine that includes me? In general, it's not considered good manners to edit others' userpages or to spam strangers. Yours, Sam Clark 20:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Affirmative action. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Adambro 18:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 20:18, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Alaska Mental Health Enabling Act, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 01:31, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Alaska Mental Health Enabling Act, you will be blocked from editing. DJBullfish (talk) 01:32, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Business letter (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 14:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Baker College constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks Rjd0060 (talk) 16:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC))

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Monochrome Photography. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. --CWY2190TC 23:20, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Monochrome Photography constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ScarianCall me Pat 23:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC))