User talk:156.34.215.223

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Cryonic Temple

Might just about scrape by... But I can't seem to access their labels site to prove their attachment. And the bands own site URL hasn't even been bought/rented yet. But if it's true, the label has a few bands on it's roster that would allow it to stay in Wikipedia. It's just a pants article. Sorry :-/ ScarianCall me Pat 10:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Huggle

Isn't actually that bad :-D - It's a little slow but still gets the job done. You came up on it actually... :-D - Could've reverted yo' ass, boy :-D ScarianCall me Pat 11:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Too much colour :D. 156.34.215.223 (talk) 11:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Maticora were attached to Scarlet records which are a notable label 'cause they have a few notable power metal bands with them. It's a tough call though... does being formerly attached to a notable label still make you notable? It would be a dodgey AfD, AMG has a couple of reviews of Manticora... and musique inclusionists love AMG... ScarianCall me Pat 11:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

With regard to your comments on User talk:Scarian: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 13:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Logos

Thanks for your messages. While I agree with you that these are inherently unencyclopedic in nearly all cases, it really isn't worth edit-warring over. It will be more productive in the long run to contribute to the debate, which I think is approaching a consensus, than to antagonise people by mass-removing logos. Give it another day or so and see what happens. Best wishes, --John (talk) 17:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] How Dare You

How dare you accuse me of vandalism and threaten to ban me. I am following the rules of Wikipedia. Not all references are created equally. Some are reliable sources. Some are not. I will continue to delete content that is badly referenced, such as the absurd sources claiming 100 million albums sold for The Who and Deep Purple. See WP:RS. Also look at the Deep Purple talk page where the 100 million sales claim has been discussed and recommended for deletion. 74.77.222.188 (talk) 10:04, 23 January 2008 (UTC)