User talk:156.34.214.181

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Do not clean up for sentences which illustrate right subjects that depends on recording. --221.113.225.26 (talk) 14:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Do not edit subjects that you are unfamiliar with using very poor spelling and grammar. 156.34.214.181 (talk) 14:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

I RV'd without looking carefully. SorryIgoldste (talk) 23:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] comment from Non-english editor

[edit] wiki recognizes english or not

How does it have poor? Don you have alternatives? --221.113.225.26 (talk) 00:31, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

It is written in correct English and has proper links to pertinent articles. No alternatives required. Your edits are very poor use of English spelling and grammar. 156.34.214.181 (talk) 00:36, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Poor or Rich, depends on your sence. Who decides Poor or correct?--221.113.225.26 (talk) 00:45, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

The editors who can comprehend it. Edits are great if they improve the article. Better to try and learn about the article subject rather than add WP:ATT and WP:MOS vios. 156.34.214.181 (talk) 00:49, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Who's comprehensive ? --221.113.225.26 (talk) 00:53, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

School system is pretty slow down under I guess? Try the Wiktionary. 156.34.214.181 (talk) 01:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Do you have logical thinking ? Who's lord ? May you are.--221.113.225.26 (talk) 01:17, 16 January 2008 (UTC)