User talk:156.34.208.112

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Hmm..

It's an interesting observation... What made you think it at first? - If I were to make a decision straight off, it's the weekend... Navnlos usually only edits from school... but yeah, Hawks is making edits to articles that Navnlos usually touched(es) and he's genre changing which Navnlos usually always bitched about... the biggest giveaway would be his edits to talk pages... Navnlos has this distinct teenagery way of talking (Damn I sound like I'm his mother and I know him so well :-D) - Anyway, tell me your thoughts and I'll keep looking. ScarianCall me Pat 13:15, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I actually didn;t think of it myself. I eavesdropped in on User:Circucisionflix's "comment" page where he made the observation himself. Circyflircysix made the error of gettin' into Naval's "hood"... but has since been working hard to be a better editor and follow the rules and guidelines and consensuses n such. He's a nice boy. He needs a cookie :D . Speaking of which poor ol Tswx(?) has risen above all the abuse he has taken from Kameejl and Bad Nav and all the other editors and continues to fight his good fight. He spurns all their abusive uncivil attacks and continually shows us all the true meaning of WP:BOLD. I was going to give him a barnstar just to give him some perk to keep going. :D . His enemy editors would just that wouldn't they :D . 156.34.208.112 (talk) 13:25, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Could you point me to the place where he notice it? User talk:CircafuciX - I'd like to read it and see how he uses logic :-D ScarianCall me Pat 13:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
That's pretty weak evidence right there... lots of users don't know how to use the minor edit thingy... Hmm... Hawks10 has made a large amount of bogus genre changes that I'm reverting... the jury is still out on this one. ScarianCall me Pat 13:46, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I've been undoing his crap all day. Ugh... I'm gonna give him an earful. Have a nice time at Church, friend. ScarianCall me Pat 15:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

[1] - Okay, I've warned him. What do you reckon? I could write those warning templates, couldn't I? :-D ScarianCall me Pat 16:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
He wasn't just reverted by us. Some of his other edits were reverted by other editors. So it would appear as though he is just like "Lumpx" and edits based on POV instead of refs. I had a terrible time keeping up with Lumpx last night. I tagged his IP as a sock. And I asked KOS to keep track. If he continues to POV his way around I will re-alert KOS and he will deal with it (or won't deal with it no matter whichever the case he feels necessary... he "admins" with teeth rather than a feather duster so he is one of the better admins I've seen). He may have advice for Hawk? 156.34.208.112 (talk) 16:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi... I would appreciate it if you wouldn't use my name like that... please use my name correctly or you can even use Circa if it's so hard for you. Please don't continue to use my name like this. I was the last person to expect this from you.

I'm actually out on a wing and at the brink of changing everything but this thought is from the very deepest depths of my brain and I'm known for my intense self-control so you are in luck but do you have to completely remove logos because you even said yourself that they could go in the main articlespace and I'm cool with that.

I appreciate the pat on the back and I could use a cookie about now but I still won't be the one to make these changes so I'll leave them up to you and other similar editors. −₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪ kaiden 23:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

But if I just say Circa it has no humour... no sarcastic tone... no wiseassness whatsoever. Which is how I tend to look at all usernames. If you haven't gathered already... I think user names are useless/foolish/unreq'd/etc. Are you old enough to drive? Does you drivers license say CircafuciX beside the spot where it says "NAME"??? I doubt it very much if it did then your parents really hated you :D . I see that you are working hard to improve. And, as I said before, I respected your attempts to rm yourself away from the twit-clan. You will only get better and better if you think "more encyclopedia", "Less fansite". Wiki would benefit if everyone entered into this place with the same philosophy. First thing you need to add to your comments page is "must get sense of humour... increase my personal level of smartassecessity" And learn to have some fun. :D . Start referring to Scarian as Swearian or whatever. Call me Flibsy instead of Libsy. Call me f*ckhead... I don't care. Names on Wikipedia mean absolutely nothing. The only name that needs to be respected is... Wikipedia. 156.34.208.112 (talk) 00:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Then again all of that is your POV :) so don't think I'm not a funny guy because I certainly am but the first thing I see from the use of those names is something else like you don't trust me so you have to use my name this way, or something like that etc. Also, it shows your bias against user names and I don't need your POV about them. And thats it! no more!! end of comment!!! −₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪ kaiden 00:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

You may be right but with this users can chose if they want a name or not, you're not the judge of all. −₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪ kaiden 00:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
At least I didn't put it in "early years" and it's been their official logo ever since meaning no minor changes to it at all. Although, their new album doesn't have the logo in it so if they never use it again "it's history" meaning it's now their logo from the old days. −₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪ kaiden 01:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Should...

Should Daylight Dies die a Wiki-death? 156.34.208.112 (talk) 01:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

It scrapes by with it's label(s) unfortunately. I'm applying for WP:HUGGLE, then I'm having a smoke and then I'm going to bed. Have a nice day, buddy. [Btw, what are you doing bitch fighting that boy up there? :-D You should know better, Libsey! Take care, mate] ScarianCall me Pat 01:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] January 2008

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
2 edits, 2 linkspam adds. My AGF disintegrated 2 years ago. Single purpose accounts aren't worth the warning effort. 156.34.208.112 (talk) 23:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Power ballad

How exactly is the article Power ballad worse now than before? I just spent time cleaning it up, which included the removal of a lot of unverified information. Rather that just tagging the article, what suggestions do you have for fixing it? Mh29255 (talk) 00:56, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD

That article you sent me (bad memory - can't remember the title) should be AfD'd. Want me to do it? ScarianCall me Pat 08:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please, stop

Your removal of logos. The "consensus" you're referring to does not really exist, as it is not yet implemented in any policy. Your actions are disruptive. Óðinn (talk) 09:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I second that. You're driving people away from Wikipedia. Is that what you want? -- Pepve (talk) 15:36, 22 January 2008 (UTC)