User talk:152.53.20.146

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with the page William Luther Pierce on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Nrbelex (talk) 20:53, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

You are most welcome, however, it was not a test and the text should not have been reverted as I corrected some erroneous information and corrected some grammar mistakes. Do you revert by reflex or do you actually care about the factual accuracy of articles within Wikipedia? Please revert it back to my edits unless you can prove your facts are more accurate or that English grammar has recently changed? Thanks. :D —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 152.53.20.146 (talk • contribs) .

Contents

[edit] Changes to William Luther Pierce

Though you only changed one word, it changed the meaning of the article and therefore the change should have been discussed on the talk page. I see you changed the article back yourself but for similar changes in the future, please discuss them first and provide evidence for your claims. Thanks Nrbelex (talk) 21:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Actually, that one word only changed the meaning to reflect a far more accurate and more NPOV, verses a POV-biased and political one. If you can't see the political bias inherent in the former term vs. the latter term, I can't see how any discussion on the Talk Pages would have really made any difference. Thanks and I call on anyone to provide evidence for any factual claims made within any articles. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 152.53.20.146 (talk • contribs) .

[edit] Edits on White Supremacist/Separatist/Nationalist Articles

As you might guess, these are highly sensitive topics on wikipedia. If you could please discuss any major changes before making them that would be appreciated. You are on the verge of an edit war, and stand to be blocked from editing. Please see WP:3RR. The Ungovernable Force 22:09, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes, these are quite "highly sensitive topics" for any real encyclopedia, and that is why it is so critical to maintain factual accuracy and a NPOV within such "politically-charged" topics. Otherwise, you run the risk of "group-think" or "PC- bias", and the encyclopedia will not be taken seriously as a "reliable and factual resource" by anyone. I don't want any so-called "edit war" and nor to be blocked from editing nor to be censored when my intent here is just to maintain factual accuracy and a NPOV within both these and within any other of these so-called "highly sensitive topics" within the Wikipedia. Thanks. :D —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 152.53.20.146 (talk • contribs) .

[edit] ========================================================

[edit] Talk:William Luther Pierce

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:02, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to William Luther Pierce. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp talk 00:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

You are most welcome, however, it was not a test and the text should not have been reverted as I corrected some erroneous information and corrected some grammar mistakes. Do you revert by reflex or do you actually care about the factual accuracy of articles within Wikipedia? Please revert it back to my edits unless you can prove your facts are more accurate or that English grammar has recently changed? Thanks. :D —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 152.53.20.146 (talk • contribs) .

Please sign your edits. You have received multiple warnings to stop vandalizing articles in regard to White Supremists. Your edit was vandalism and was treated as such. Thanks for using wikipedia. --Alphachimp talk 00:06, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Here is the article and my revisions and it is clear that none were "vandalism", as you have so falsely claimed, and it is also clear that you are indeed a "Alpha chimp", as you even can't spell correctly in the English language. I guess they allow any "moronic chimps" to edit this Wikipedia now. Isn't PC Marxist affirmative action great? :D


[edit] Blocked

Blocked as probable mock-puppet of banned user Paul Vogel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log). -Will Beback 03:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)