User talk:152.216.11.5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~. ‡ Jarlaxle 20:09, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Vandalism

You've vandalised Matt Wiese twice now. Please stop. McPhail 20:18, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Thiel College. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Xyrael T 19:52, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

  • I also have reverted a recent edit made to the article Alomari. There was no explanation of why you erased a translation tag. This is the english wikipedia so it was appropriate for me to label it as such. If you wish to discuss this go to the page listed on the tag. Thank you. Lsjzl 17:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More vandalism

Thank you for experimenting with the page User talk:Evrik on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --evrik 01:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bahá'í division page

Hello, as much as I'm on your side regarding your edits to the Bahá'í division page, we must strive to be as neutral in the presentation of the article. The article has to just present facts, and not conclusions or interpretations. Regards. -- Jeff3000 19:24, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --nkayesmith 11:27, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Monsters of Rock page

I reverted your edit of Monsters of Rock because your comment ("This is not correct, I was there and it was Queensryche and not Pantera who performed") did not belong on the main page. You appear to have removed it and added other information while I was trying to figure out what I was doing - I apologize for the edit conflict.

Beezhive 04:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Talk page

Please don't edit other people's comments, it's considered vandalism. -- Jeff3000 22:05, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 15:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Oguz1

FYI This appears to be the IP address of User:Oguz1. --Macrakis 18:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

It's a proxy server, it's the IP of many, many, many people, and you are stalking. Get a job.
you just broke the Wiki privacy rule!!!

Wikimedia privacy policy On Wikimedia projects, privacy policy considerations are of tremendous importance. Unless someone is definitely violating policy with their actions (e.g. massive bot vandalism or spam), revealing their IP, whereabouts or other information sufficient to identify them is likely a violation.

Policy on release of data derived from page logs It is the policy of Wikimedia that personally identifiable data collected in the server logs will not be released by the developers who have access to it, except as follows: In response to a valid subpoena or other compulsory request from law enforcement With permission of the affected user To the chair of Wikimedia Foundation, his legal counsel, or his designee, when necessary for investigation of abuse complaints. Where the information pertains to page views generated by a spider or bot and its dissemination is necessary to illustrate or resolve technical issues. Where the user has been vandalising pages or persistently behaving in a disruptive way, data may be released to assist in the targeting of IP blocks, or to assist in the formulation of a complaint to relevant Internet Service Providers Where it is reasonably necessary to protect the rights, property or safety of the Wikimedia Foundation, its users or the public. Wikimedia policy does not permit public distribution of such information under any circumstances, except as described above.

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/CheckUser#CheckUser_status —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Oguz1 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC).

I broke no rules, and certainly didn't access any non-public information (like server logs). On my talk page, 152.216.11.5 wrote that he had done something which was something Oguz1 had done. Assuming no one is lying, that means that Oguz1 uses 152.216.11.5 -- it does not mean that other people don't, too. --Macrakis 19:38, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Turkish coffee

Uhh...why would I block someone just because he's not adding information to the article? He's reverting edits that he feels go against consensus established at the article's talk page, or material he feels is too POV. Nishkid64 20:55, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Leonard McCoy

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Leonard McCoy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nlu (talk) 22:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)