User talk:149.254.192.195

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 149.254.192.195, is registered to T-Mobile UK, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Hmrox (talk) 02:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] Ugly Betty Summary Episode 4

Was that you who did the summary? Nice job, I'm impressed.

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did at Ejaculation. It is considered vandalism. If you consider that part of a page should be removed, please discuss the matter on the article's talk page. The Wednesday Island 00:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

This is a roaming IP address so was picked up by someone who did not cause the offending modification.


Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses Nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You may want to look at Wikipedia:Spam for more guidelines --WillMcC 20:01, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] February 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to London Nautical School, you will be blocked. Cocoaguy ここがいい contribstalkTodays Pick 01:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning


[edit] March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Wikipedia talk:Community Portal do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Prolog 15:53, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

[edit] Capoeira

[edit] March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Capoeira do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tartaruga 02:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Tartaruga 06:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] May 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Chinese philosophy. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:42, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Tmobileint.gif

Hello 149.254.192.195, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Tmobileint.gif) was found at the following location: User:149.254.192.195. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 149.254.192.195 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Kurykh 00:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Shilpa Shetty (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 16:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 25.6.2007

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.--AAikio 12:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Raichu. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SmileToday☺(talk to me , My edits) 22:45, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:CharlotteBoseley, you will be blocked from editing. HappiestCamper 18:27, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Francis Drake worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Will (aka Wimt) 20:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles, as you did at Philip Brady. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Indon (reply) — 19:53, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lionel Curtis. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. — Indon (reply) — 19:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Trojan horse (computing). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Angus Lepper(T, C, D) 22:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


Your recent edit to Iain Lee (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adding uncited material to Clive Bull

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. 172.201.182.142 22:15, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Nicola Roxon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 12:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Nicola Roxon, you will be blocked from editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 12:51, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 72 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Metros (talk) 13:20, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am a rugular user and have not made the postings in question. This is a multi ip address. Please unblock"

Decline reason: "No. Wait for the block to expire and then create an account, so that you will not be affected by the block next time it happens. — Sandstein (talk) 21:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Edward I of England. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kaká. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. delldot talk 19:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Steve Allen (LBC radio presenter), you will be blocked from editing. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 19:42, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Nick Abbot. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 19:42, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Homoman11". The reason given for Homoman11's block is: "Vandalism: Conduct block with username component".

  • Decline reason:

In my opinion, after reviewing the recent contributions of this IP, this IP is at this time being used only by User:Homoman11. For that reason, it should remain blocked in order to prevent further vandalism. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:00, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Daihatsu, you will be blocked from editing. Rgoodermote  02:01, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Prawn farm massacre. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. *Cremepuff222* 01:50, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Leaflet, you will be blocked from editing. Hmrox (talk) 02:48, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Acalamari 02:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Acalamari 02:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Shahrukh Khan (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Xfm Manchester. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Escape Orbit (Talk) 17:43, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dave Kitson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Transferred (talk) 15:42, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Philip Brady (broadcaster), you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dreadstar † 06:35, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Stop repeatedly reverting Philip Brady (broadcaster) to add your unreferenced information. If what you say is true, it has ro be properly referenced. Otherwise, it will be reverted because it violates WP:BLP. I have tried to discuss this with you on the talk page, please join the discussion. Snowfire51 (talk) 06:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Your recent edit to Maajid Nawaz (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 23:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 22:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 22:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to V (The Second Generation), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 17:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Space Race (TV series), you will be blocked from editing. -- - (User) WolfKeeper (Talk) 07:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Philip Brady (broadcaster) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 23:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Philip Brady (broadcaster) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 23:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC))

A link was used to cite the fact he is home 149.254.192.195 (talk) 23:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Philip Brady (broadcaster). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Keilana|Parlez ici 23:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Philip Brady (broadcaster). - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 23:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Philip Brady

None of those sources mention Philip Brady anywhere in them. Your continuance of adding the info is vandalism. You've been warned. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 23:36, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

He is homo and link was cited 149.254.192.195 (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


Why has wiki been using it's resources for 3 months to revert constructive and now cited edits. What a waste of time. People who don't knwo the issues spending their waking hours reverting what is now proven to be the truth. Also, T-mobile users were blocked for 2 months straight because constructive edits were banned. It is Phil's producer that is twisting the truth. Not me with valid and cited edits. 149.254.192.195 (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Your edits are being reverted because none of the sources you provide mention him. Also, as the sources are merely unsubstantiated quotes from another person, they probably wouldn't pass WP:SOURCE anyway. Snowfire51 (talk) 23:46, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I have even put up new ones. Read the whole article. 149.254.192.195 (talk) 23:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

It doesn't. Please stop, until you can provide reliable sources and not just rumors. Snowfire51 (talk) 23:51, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Roxon

No other cabinet ministers have their religion in their infobox, so desist your persisting edits NOW. Timeshift (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Religion is a valid part of the template. It wouldn't be in the template if it wasn't valis. What about Abbott? 149.254.192.195 (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

See the talk page. Timeshift (talk) 00:04, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 weeks. for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. · AndonicO Hail! 23:50, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


This IP address, 149.254.192.195, is registered to T-Mobile UK, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers

{{unblock|aparently this account was blocked by timeshift. Looking at nicola Roxon I see that the changes the user was blocked for were actually added after other users complained about timeshift??!!?? The user of this IP added that she had a jewish grandfather and was blocked. So the whole of T-mobile is blocked because Timeshift didn't like a reference to a jewish grandfather that is referenced.}}

HAHAHA gold. Yet again more lies and slander. I encourage all and sundry to read Talk:Nicola Roxon. Timeshift (talk) 00:22, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DO NOT BLOCK THIS ACCOUNT AS ABOVE

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This IP address, 149.254.192.195, is registered to T-Mobile UK, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers. This is treated just like AOL"

Decline reason: "We are treating this just like AOL. You'll want to contact T-Mobile to get them to use the XFF headers. — Yamla (talk) 23:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


{{unblock|can you please unblock. I used to post a lot on this cite but can't anymore. It's a bit silly to block everyone who uses the most popular internet in the uk. If users start vandalising then unblock but this is getting annoying. I can't even set up an account.}}

{{149.254.192.195|: Vandalism|AndonicO}}

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to BBC, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cenarium (talk) 10:45, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org.

Admins reviewing unblock requests on this IP are advised to look at the history of this account and that of .192.192 as well - while they do indeed belong to T-Mobile, an analysis of edits suggests neither are used extensively by other users, and this one has caused a lot of problems on several articles. A LTA case is in the process of being drafted. As at least 4 other admins are now directly involved in investigating this case, WP:BLOCKs provisions relating to involved editors has been satisfied in my case. Orderinchaos 20:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: " Please advise why this was blocked. What site was affected and what breach of policy occured? The BBC?"

Decline reason: "this IP address has been the source of no positive contributions for a long time. Given the level of abuse, a long term block seems unavoidable to minimize damage to Wikipedia. If innocent users are affected, they may still create accounts at a different computer, and edit while logged in.--Jayron32.talk.contribs 21:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This IP was blocked for 6 months ( I think). Looking at the contribs from when it was unblocked I can't see any vandalism ( seriously). Could you go through and check? I see it has caused problems in the past but the block expired and there was no vandalism. 200,000 people use this IP and I for one would like to edit confidentially occasionally."

Decline reason: "From blanking pages, to changing random words in articles, to all other sundry sorts of vandalism, this IP address has been the source of non-stop problems for some time, including every edit between each prior, shorter block. It has unfortunately become necessary to prevent anonymous people from editing via this IP address. While I appreciate that this specific IP address may dynamically change, it is not specifically used by 200,000 people at once. However, if you are experiencing difficulty editing because some of the IP addresses used by your Internet Service Provider have been blocked, you may still create an account and edit via an account. Doing so is trivial, and only involves sending an email to accounts-enwiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org explaining the trouble you have been having, and a volunteer will be along shortly to create an account for you. Thank you, and good luck. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 00:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Since the page was last unblocked I do not see any vandalism. There was no valid reason to unblock this page again. Seriously, this should not be blocked because there is no longer a vandalism problem. It is not correct to block for no reason"

Decline reason: "I see lots of valid reason for this block, just look above and below you, if you are an innocent editor caught in this block please request an account by emailing accounts-enwiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org, by using an account you can bypass the block, also opening another unblock request will be considered abuse of the unblock template and will result in your talk page being protected — Chris 01:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Since I have responded to the last request, I will leave it to another admin to deal with it. Consider the sequence of events:

  • Blocked on Feb 8 for 3 weeks.
  • After that block expired, the next 5 edits were as follows:
    • [1] blanked the BBC page.
    • [2], [3], [4] three successive edits to Ricky Hatton article which ammounted to blanking the article.
    • [5] made a pointless change of the title of the video game from Medal of Honor to Table of Honor for no apparent reason.
    • [6] this piece of screed left at Talk:Nicola Roxon which attacks an admin, and makes a veiled legal and physical threat against other editors.
  • It should also be noted that this IP has been used to tendentiously edit the Nicola Roxon article for a LONG time, indicating that it is a single, disruptive user is using this IP address. If an innocent person has been caught in the block, they can request an registered account via email by sending an message to accounts-enwiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org . Any admin looking at this request should keep this evidence in mind. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 01:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "this is a shared ip?"

Decline reason: "Evidence suggests sockpuppet is trying to evade block. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Exactly 3 minutes after I blocked User:Jelelasesa, GaryGazza/Bruce99999's latest sockpuppet which uses this IP consistently, this request came in. Orderinchaos 19:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "shared IP address for T-Mobile 2G handsets with full www. Apparently location specific shared IP. length of current block excessive for stated reasons. against wmf fundamentals"

Decline reason: "There has been a steady stream of abuse from this IP address, whatever it's source.— Stwalkerster [ talk ] 21:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "this block is against wmf fundamentals. Please explain why the wiki rules should be broken in this case?"

Decline reason: "We don't like vandalism, that's why. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 21:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: " That is not a reason, just because you don't like someone doesn't mean you can breach wmf fundamentals. Please provide a documented reason for such an excessive block on a shared IP "

Decline reason: "We routinely place anon-only blocks on IP addresses that have been used repeatedly for vandalism. This account is no exception. If you want to edit, create an account. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 21:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "can you enable account creation then? I can't email you from a T-mobile address as users are not provided one."

Decline reason: "You can email from yahoo or hotmail or any other free provider. I will protect this page to stop this abuse of template the next time you post! — MBisanz talk 22:32, 24 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Hello, I have just set up my T-mobile account and would like to edit without logging in due to privacy reasons."

Decline reason: "There have been too many disruptive edits from this IP address. If you want to edit with more privacy, registering an account will be more secure from that point of view, because IP addresses can be traced, whereas if you register an account, your IP address is hidden from view. — Stwalkerster [ talk ] 19:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.