User talk:148.87.1.172

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 148.87.1.172, is registered to Oracle Corporation, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] David Saslav

I have placed a tag on the article David Saslav, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. I did this because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person but it does not indicate how or why that person is notable. If you can indicate why David Saslav is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:David Saslav. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 22:36, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Tom Harrison Talk 19:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 06:08, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dates on Civilization

I have reverted your change to BC/AD dates. As you erroneously believe that this is Wikipedia standard, please see: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers). Both patterns are available for editors to use here and, although people are quite heated about their personal preference for the systems, it is up to the editors of each article to establish a standard. In general, articles which deal with history and archaeology, but not Christian era religion, tend to vote for and use the BCE/CE system. If you strongly disagree, bring it up on the talk page for another round of discussion. Best wishes. WBardwin 20:21, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia! Your test worked, and thank you for reverting or removing it yourself. The best way to do tests in the future would be to use the sandbox. You can look at these pages as well: how to edit a page, the tutorial, and how to write a great article. All of these pages are good places to start. Again, welcome, and I hope that you will like Wikipedia. --Porqin 16:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Khatri, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tuspm(C | @) 00:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

You have recently vandalized a Wikipedia article, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own. Tuspm(C | @) 00:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:46, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Redditch. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ST47 11:14, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's NPOV policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Association rule learning, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Gray Porpoise 23:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during September 22, 2006

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Luna Santin 23:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Luna Santin 00:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] External links

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Identity management. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites that you are affiliated with, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Picaroon9288 22:47, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikram Rai

  • Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Danny Lilithborne 23:40, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Percent-encoding. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Michaelas10 (Talk) 14:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] February 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Wikipedia:Username policy, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Glen 12:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

[edit] Ronald Reagan Edits

Hi there. Thank You for adding a large paragraph to Ronald Reagan's section, but NOTHING that you said in there was cited!!! You must, must, MUST cite anything fact that you add to any article on Wikipedia. Sadly, for that reason, your paragraph was deleted. If you need help, visit Template:Citebook or Template:Citeweb, or contact a Wikipedia administrator. Thanks, Happyme22 22:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Jim Gray (computer scientist) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Matteo 09:49, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Media Matters for America

Please do not use edit summaries which are intentionally misleading or blatantly incorrect. Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 20:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] widest and shortest

Err, OK, but why? jhawkinson 02:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to University of San Francisco

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page University of San Francisco do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:06, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to University of the Pacific. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Shin Bet. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Chiranjeevi. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lemonflashtalk 01:00, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on global warming controversy. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. MastCell Talk 20:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vladimir Voltchkov

Someone on this IP address recently blanked a section from Vladimir Voltchkov as being a duplicate of a similar section from Roger Federer. I checked things out, and you appear to have been correct. Thanks for the edit! :) – Luna Santin (talk) 18:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Climate change denial:

Your recent edit to Climate change denial (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 21:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Wafa Sultan on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Will (aka Wimt) 00:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wafa Sultan. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wafa Sultan was changed by 148.87.1.172 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-09-13T20:24:17+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 00:24, 14 September 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wafa Sultan, you will be blocked from editing. Will (aka Wimt) 00:28, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Global warming controversy

Howdy, I noticed your edits to the Global warming controversy article. I took the liberty of reverting the changes; Wikipedia needs reliable sources which back up information added. It is impermissible to extrapolate from sources (such as interpret the data) per no original research policy. If you have any questions, feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page, User_talk:TeaDrinker. Thanks, --TeaDrinker 21:15, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 438 BC, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 438 BC was changed by 148.87.1.172 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-04T14:56:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to January 8 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 21:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Young Precise do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://myspace.com/precisethachef"Precise) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 20:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Sufism has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tiddly-Tom 07:08, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 25, 2008

Thanks for experimenting with the page Keely Smith on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Paul20070 (talk) 19:07, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Maximum the Hormone do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://www.myspace.com/maximumthehormone) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 19:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Onorem♠Dil 00:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Philipp von Boeselager has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sam Korn (smoddy) 15:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)