User talk:146.87.255.19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This host, helene.salford.ac.uk, is registered to University of Salford and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP may result in an immediate block without further warning.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

This message is regarding the page Adolf Hitler. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. --Nlu 15:19, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

This message is regarding the page McDonald's. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Alf melmac 13:47, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Alf melmac 13:49, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, please refrain from vandalizing or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. -- Arwel (talk) 21:11, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Sande society was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 14:26, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Regarding edits made during August 4, 2006 (UTC) to Missing white woman syndrome

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. 1568 05:21, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Courteney Cox, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Yamla 15:52, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Yamla 16:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Further vandalism

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to John Travolta, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 16:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 30 December 2006

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Heimstern Läufer 02:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Harry (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Socialism on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. —Travis C/T\U 13:17, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Craig Smith, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jsc83 21:39, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Martin Keown, you will be blocked from editing. Qwghlm 00:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

We certainly hope, but this is not the place for such edits. Please make constructive improvements and keep in mind this is not a blog. Perspicacite 20:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Zimbabwe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ZimZalaBim talk 00:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to J. Holiday, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 12:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Your recent edit to Regal (Hastings) v Gulliver (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 15:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Consent has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:51, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Poisson distribution (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 11:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 18:51, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rapid prototyping, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rapid prototyping was changed by 146.87.255.19 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-07T12:25:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Radiologic technologist, you will be blocked from editing. JNW (talk) 12:26, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Circumcision, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Quintote (talk) 01:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Circumcision, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Quintote (talk) 02:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Amy Carmichael. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Brian0324 (talk) 14:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  • You need to take a look at WP:BLP and WP:RS. We do not deal in gutter rumours here. Thanks. --Rodhullandemu 00:00, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Wicca. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AlexiusHoratius (talk) 23:59, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Genital modification and mutilation appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Jakew (talk) 00:10, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Genital modification and mutilation has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Catgut (talk) 02:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Genital modification and mutilation constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Catgut (talk) 02:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

If you'd have just left the original change of 'Western' to 'American' instead of lying about male genital mutilation spreading into the Western world in general, I might have left the silly religious name for male genital mutilation alone. But the more you lie, the more I'll edit.

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Genital modification and mutilation. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Jakew (talk) 10:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

It was not my personal analysis - the lie about male genital mutilation having spread to the West is personal analysis. Stop lying and I'll stop editing the article, I'll even refrain from correcting the term from "circumcision" to it's proper title.

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Genital modification and mutilation, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jakew (talk) 10:10, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

YOU are violating it and you know it. You know damn well that genital mutilation didn't spread into the West, but yet again an American is ignorantly assuming everything about America applies to the rest of the world. Newsflash: The West does not mutilate infants. The West does not abbreviate all their state names or know what American abbreviations are. The West has no idea what the hell a "twinkie" is except in reference to gay men. The West is NOT AMERICA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.87.255.18 (talk) 23:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Finalnight (talk) 23:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

You know very well I'm correcting and not disrupting. See above.

[edit] Sockpuppet

User was range-blocked for two weeks till 6/10. User then apparently created Lionseeker to continue vandalizing and has been blocked on that account as well.--Finalnight (talk) 05:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)