User talk:143.58.161.6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with the page Walgreens on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp talk 21:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Walgreens. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp talk 21:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

==Please Use Edit Summaries==

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Wikipediarules2221 20:39, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Jewish eschatology, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TellyaddictEditor review! 19:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

  • I cannot Sorry but I reverted your edit because it removed content and replaced it with 3 lines of text, because of this I can't revert my edit as it is more appropriate as it is now.TellyaddictEditor review! 20:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • The bit in which you added was not referenced either and the previous version is more detailed.TellyaddictEditor review! 20:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • It also seems you have vandalised two other articles by writing offensive things about employee of the month on. Trying to remain civil here but here is the link to the page in which I am talking about above, as you requested.
  • I tried to revert my own edits but it's not letting me. Some info does seem to be slightly biased, however the biased bit can just be removed and the other non-biased info kept. If I did revert my own edit I would be violating the Three Revert Rule. Also please remember to sign your name on talk pages bu inserting ~~~~
  • The only that edit could not of been you (mentioned above) is if your IP adress is shared which is hard to determine.TellyaddictEditor review! 17:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 20:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Irish Potato Famine, you will be blocked from editing. Taramoon 18:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism: last warning

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to my userpage, you will be blocked from editing. Nyttend 16:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay S. Thomas

WP:NPA. Corvus cornix 16:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay S. Thomas. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Corvus cornix 17:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Do you really think that the Reverend Thomas would approve of the sort of language and personal attacks that are being thrown around on his behalf? Corvus cornix 17:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Do you think that Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP would approve of the kind of language and personal attacks that are being made by users of their equipment? Corvus cornix 17:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.--Wafulz 17:16, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Liquid2ice". The reason given for Liquid2ice's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

  • Decline reason:

Address currently being used by blocked vandal. — Yamla 00:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)