User talk:143.52.5.11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 143.52.5.11, is registered to Sheffield Hallam University, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] Warnings

Note: Remember to always substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | interiot's tool | page moves | block log | block list]

[edit] January 2007

  1. Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (Previous unsigned comment made by User:Ste1n at 16:28, January 12, 2007, UTC)
  2. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Parliament Acts page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Hersfold (talk|work) 23:14, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
  3. Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Wetherspoons, you will be blocked. Gwernol 16:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

  1. This is your last warning.
    The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Bristol, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Steve (Slf67) talk 00:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
  2. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Pharmaceutical company, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: #:link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Thaurisil 12:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
  3. Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Network intrusion detection system, even if your ultimate intention is to revert them. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- intgr 08:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Elton John, you will be blocked from editing. Darthgriz98 17:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. TimVickers 17:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

. TimVickers 17:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to General (United States). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -SpuriousQ (talk) 16:08, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Marching squares

Your recent edit to Marching squares (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 22:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Navy. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Soosed 09:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Religious studies, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Soosed 09:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Medium-density fibreboard, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. xompanthy 13:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Alan Carr. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —David Johnson [T|C] 09:36, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Alan Carr, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —David Johnson [T|C] 09:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] May 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:David Johnson, you will be blocked from editing. MER-C 09:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning.

[edit] You have been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours for vandalism and personal attacks. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. – Rianaऋ 09:51, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to United Kingdom. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Guinnog 15:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Guinnog 15:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Guinnog 15:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Henry VIII of England (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sabrage

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. AgneCheese/Wine 19:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chris Bush (playwright), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jfire (talk) 16:35, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Public school. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BlckKnght (talk) 19:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dunstable, you will be blocked from editing. ScarianCall me Pat 18:38, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Honduras, you will be blocked from editing. Kww (talk) 17:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Welcome

Hello! I've noticed that you have edited Wikipedia without logging in to an account. I'm happy that you've been contributing. However, I urge you to create an account. Here is a list of the benefits of having an account:

There are no cons to signing up for an account. In fact, you can find even more pros at the "why create an account" page! Signing up is completely free and you don't need to enter any personal information! Plus you can have a user page like mine! So, unless you can think of a con, sign up for an account right now! BlckKnght (talk) 00:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ann Widdecombe. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tnxman307 (talk) 13:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Broadacre City has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tiddly-Tom 14:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Castleford Tigers

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Castleford Tigers. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Keith D (talk) 17:57, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Newton Faulkner, you will be blocked from editing. Samtheboy (t/c) 18:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Goals Soccer Centres, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Goals Soccer Centres was changed by 143.52.5.11 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-04-28T13:16:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:16, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Goals Soccer Centres constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 13:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC))


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dewsbury, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Dewsbury was changed by 143.52.5.11 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-28T20:15:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:15, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. utcursch | talk 12:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)