User talk:142.151.175.39

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 142.151.175.39, is registered to University of Toronto and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] January 2007

Thank you for experimenting with the page Lamarckism on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Gwern (contribs) 06:21 15 January 2007 (GMT) 06:21, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Social darwinism, even if your ultimate intention is to revert them. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Justin Eiler 03:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Free Software and Open Source

Please stop modifying articles that read "X is free software", to now read "X is free and open source software". We all know that Open Source is a subset of Free Software, so that something can qualify as the former and not the latter, but never as the latter and not the former. Therefore, tagging as "open source" something that is already tagged as free software is redundant to say the least, and could be taken as POV pushing. — Isilanes 14:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC) .

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Tor (anonymity network) page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — Isilanes 14:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the X Window System page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — Isilanes 14:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Moodle page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — Isilanes 14:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the EHUX page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — Isilanes 14:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the .LRN page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — Isilanes 14:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to xpdf, you will be blocked from editing. --Oneiros 15:39, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Mesa 3D, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You were warned about overzealously adding "and open source" to articles about free software, remember? — Isilanes 15:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.--Boffob 02:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MIT License and free software license

Hi! Could you please explaing on Talk:MIT License why you are repeatedly removing the free software license link. Ahy1 11:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Quebec sovereignty movement, you will be blocked from editing. --Boffob 03:28, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding stack (category theory)

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- Fropuff 04:08, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by continued edit warring at stack (category theory) without discussion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. -- Fropuff 18:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your 7 March 2007 deletion of a source citation from the Albinism article

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalise Wikipedia once again, you will be blocked from editing. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 05:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stalking

While reviewing some of your edits, I noticed that a series of them are reverting the same user's edits at the articles on Bettie Hinton, Erika Ritter, and several others. To an outsider, this kind of stalking looks as if its meant to harass her, and wikipedia strictly forbids this kind of behaviour, as you can see at WP:HARASS. If this does not stop, you will be blocked. semper fictilis 13:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Great Global Warming Swindle

I don't kno wif you are aware of it, but your revert deletes the following sourced paragraph:

On March 14, 2007, The Independent published a further investigation of the programme's claims which uncovered the fact that the programme makers had selectively used data which was sometimes decades old, and introduced other serious errors of their own.
'Mr Durkin admitted that his graphics team had extended the time axis along the bottom of the graph to the year 2000. "There was a fluff there," he said. If Mr Durkin had gone directly to the Nasa website he could have got the most up-to-date data. This would have demonstrated that the amount of global warming since 1975, as monitored by terrestrial weather stations around the world, has been greater than that between 1900 and 1940 - although that would have undermined his argument. "The original Nasa data was very wiggly-lined and we wanted the simplest line we could find," Mr Durkin said.' [1]

Please restore it, or at least refrain from deleting it again without discussion. Thanks. --Stephan Schulz 13:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I added those paragraphs, and I can't see any reason at all for not having it in the "Criticism and Reaction" section, so I'm going to restore it. If you wish to delete it again, please explain why on the Talk page for "The Great Global Warming Swindle". Thanks.

--Merlinme 13:44, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Tor (anonymity network), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Moodle, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

You have been warned multiple times for your persistent bias into modifying "free software" references adding to them/substituting them with "open source". Please, desist. — Isilanes 18:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 31 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. Kukini hablame aqui 22:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to XML, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Isilanes 19:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Tor (anonymity network), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Isilanes 19:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to David Gross, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Isilanes 12:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Pov-Ray. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Amatulic 19:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Neoconservatism, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Isilanes 14:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Isilanes 14:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Constructive solid geometry, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Isilanes 14:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Cosma Shalizi, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Isilanes 14:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to The Mather School, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Isilanes 14:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for vandalism of Wikipedia

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for an extended period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:12, 24 April 2007 (UTC)