User talk:138.39.7.3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 10:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 10:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Era notation

Please see WP:MOSDATE. Thanks. ←Humus sapiens ну? 20:23, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Per WP:MOSDATE, it is against policy to change the era styles in an article (either from BC/AD to BCE/CE or vice versa) without first discussing the change on the talk page and gaining clear consensus for it there. siafu 20:51, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Again, please review WP:MOSDATE. If I find you unilaterally changing era notations again I will block this IP. Jayjg (talk) 02:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Vandalism-only account: only edits for the purpose of changing era notations, warned many times

  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- Yamla (talk) 19:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

{{unblock|this is a multi-user IP. a forever block is unwarranted}}

Contacted blocking admin for comment; agree previous behavior was disruptive, but not sure an indefinite block was called for. – Luna Santin (talk) 19:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Request accepted, as the editing patterns of this IP seem to suggest a multi-user environment, and an indefinite block on an IP after so few warnings does seem excessive and not in line with the spirit of our policies. Please keep in mind, however, that this address will still be blocked if the disruptive content warring continues.

Request handled by: krimpet✽ 06:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)