User talk:131.111.243.34

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Warnings

[edit] Gayndah, Queensland

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Gayndah, Queensland article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! The text appeared to be copied from http://www.gayndah.qld.gov.au/phpcms/page.php?id=90 --Scott Davis Talk 04:22, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Gentlemen Patricians of Downing College on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Paleorthid 04:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Robert Christgau, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Robert Christgau was changed by 131.111.243.34 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-12-15T23:29:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Robert Christgau (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 23:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Tom Chaplin, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Anthony Rupert (talk) 00:22, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Les Liaisons dangereuses has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 12:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Les Liaisons dangereuses. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Art LaPella (talk) 22:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Sarah Morris has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Roadrunnerz45 (talk 2 me) 11:03, 5 May 2008 (UTC)