User talk:130.234.5.136
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Why do you think that "bulls given by the Pope" is a necessary attribute of the Northern crusades? --Ghirla -трёп- 13:56, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- Without the Papal bull, it is not a crusade, at least not officially. Swedish or Finnish historians never call the Birger Jarls failed attack to the Neva River a crusade.
- Hmm, any particular reason why we should stick to the terminology of Swedish or Finnish (?) historians? I don't think they are impartial. --Ghirla -трёп- 14:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- I might say some equally prejudical things of the Russian historians...but let it be. However, I fail to understand your point. What do you mean with this suspicion of "partiality"? How on earth the word "crusade" is impartial in this particular context? Even if there were an evil Finnish medievalist pursuing a sinister anti-Russian agenda (and rest assured: such creatures do not exist anymore), what would he gain by refusing to call Birger Jarl's operation as a crusade?
- Hmm, any particular reason why we should stick to the terminology of Swedish or Finnish (?) historians? I don't think they are impartial. --Ghirla -трёп- 14:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Is there any particular reason why we should call the Swedish attacks "crusades"? As far as we know, most of them were not called crusades during the Middle Ages. I think King Magnus Eriksson got a Crusade bull for his failed campaign in 1348. However, most of these attacks were dubbed as Crusades only in the 19th century, during the National-Romanticist phase of medieval historiography. 130.234.5.137 15:56, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
-
It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Jamaica. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Mr Stephen 09:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Wales page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sciurinæ 11:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Wales, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sciurinæ 11:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
FWIW, this IP has switched tenants and is no longer used by the same person as in March 2007. (I should register an account I guess.) -- 28 Sept 2007
- Infact this IP belongs to a proxy server. --130.234.5.136 (talk) 12:11, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |