User talk:130.220.79.178

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 130.220.79.178, is registered to University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Campus and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

Thank you for experimenting with the page Decision making on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. – sampi (talk•contrib•email) 03:10, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Ricky. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. BJTalk 14:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] Regarding edits made during November 30, 2006 (UTC) to Minefields in Croatia

Thanks for your contribution, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the Sandbox to get started. I hope you can help us out! If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Asteriontalk 09:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made 18 March 2007 to Bilberry

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. 1312020Wikicop 02:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] External link on Christadelphian article

Hello 130.220.79.178
Thanks for the link on the Christadelphian article - it looks like a great site! Unfortunately, it's currently outside the scope of what is "allowed" in the link section: there's been a fair deal of discussion on this already; see here, for example. Basically, if every ecclesia or group of ecclesias put a website on the article then there would be hundreds and hundreds of links, and the link section would end up longer than the article. Sorry about this, particularly because the site you linked to looks very useful, but I hope you understand.
Yours, --Woofboy 10:12, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Christian. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Mr Stephen 08:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -SCEhardT 12:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] May 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Kye. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 11:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Blocking you for 24 hours foryour vandalism of David and other articles after multiple prior warnings. --Shirahadasha 16:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Parawirra, you will be blocked. - Zeibura S. Kathau (Info | Talk) 07:04, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Vijay (disambiguation) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Gurchzilla 10:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Expert system on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. alphachimp 06:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Martin Neary. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bencherlite 06:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Jeff Ooi page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Two hundred percent 11:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Millencolin. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kudret abi 05:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] September 2007

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Minda Inc, you will be blocked from editing. --Bencomplain 06:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Religious tourism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Religious tourism was changed by 130.220.79.178 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-10-17T07:39:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 07:39, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bruce Djité, you will be blocked from editing. DoyleyTalk 23:38, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Friedrich Nietzsche, you will be blocked from editing. Mentifisto 08:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Regarding your edits to Computer-mediated communication:

Your recent edit to Computer-mediated communication (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 04:56, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Computer-mediated communication, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ageekgal (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] May 2008

In a recent edit, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to other English-speaking countries, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the appropriate variety of English used there. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Thank you. - Eureka Lott 04:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)