User talk:130.216.191.184

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NOTE TO ADMINISTRATORS: Please consider that this is an IP address of the University of Auckland and as such is shared by hundreds of computers around the campus. Blocking this IP address means the possibility blocking other, innocent, Wikipedians who are trying to use the site (like me!) -- PageantUpdater
Image:Info-pictogram.png Attention:

This IP address, 130.216.191.184, is registered to the University of Auckland and is shared by multiple users who are students, professors etc at the university. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact the university to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

Hostname: gate2.ec.auckland.ac.nz

Contents

[edit] March 2006

  1. Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to User:Hkf57. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 21:40, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  2. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot2 03:07, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 2006

  1. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 03:18, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  2. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 03:20, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  3. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Loren 03:36, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  4. It might not have been your intent, but you recently removed content from Stigmata. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Darkfred Talk to me 04:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
  5. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Action potential. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Adrian(Talk) 09:05, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
  6. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Helen Clark. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. —Cuiviénen, Friday, 28 April 2006 @ 01:08 UTC 01:08, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
  7. Your recent edit to Helen Clark was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 01:11, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
  8. Your recent edit to Corporate social responsibility was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 00:08, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] May 2006 (part 1)

  1. Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Capital punishment in the United States. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ConDemTalk 02:41, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
  2. Your recent edit to Egyptian Revival architecture was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 01:30, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
  3. This is your last warning for editing Arthur-Virden. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // Tawkerbot2 01:32, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. Shanel § 01:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
  1. Your recent edit to Breadth-first search was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 02:52, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  2. It might not have been your intent, but you recently removed content from Te Henga (Bethells Beach). Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. -ReuvenkT C E 06:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mao Zedong

Wikipedia is not itself an acceptable source for claims. See WP:RS mgekelly 11:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] May 2006 (part 2)

  1. Your recent edit to Cristiano Ronaldo was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 06:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  2. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Cristiano Ronaldo. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. mboverload@ 06:20, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  3. Your recent edit to Foobar was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 09:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  4. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Voice over IP. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. —PaperTruths 09:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] June 2006

  1. Thank you for experimenting with the page Tana Umaga on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. --Muchness 00:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Ski-doo. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Disavian 04:28, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Pharmacokinetics

Your recent edit to Pharmacokinetics was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 00:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. Dr. Zaret 04:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:42, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page February 13 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Fabricationary 04:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - The Good Doctor (Dr. Zaret) 04:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Cognitive radio

Your recent edit to Cognitive radio (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 01:48, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Computer hardware. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. °≈§→ Robomæyhem: T/←§≈° 00:26, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp talk 02:14, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp talk 02:15, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Kungfu Adam (talk) 02:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Gwernol 02:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

If you continue to vandalise this page while blocked, I will protect the page so you can't edit here either. Thanks, Gwernol 02:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes, its very clear that you don't care at all about the legitimate users from Auckland who you have got blocked. This page is now protected to prevent further vandalism. Gwernol 02:19, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
As they say in the movies, "oh be-have". Seriously, though, we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so don't make joke edits. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write whatever you want (as long as it's not offensive).

ViridaeTalk 03:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User talk:130.216.191.184, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Bigtop 19:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User talk:130.216.191.184, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Bigtop 19:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Do Not Remove Warnings

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. physicq210 19:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to remove warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --physicq210 19:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. --physicq210 22:17, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Yule Nielsen Effect

Your recent edit to Yule Nielsen Effect (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 19:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Big surprise, huh? --woggly 20:02, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|Indefinitely blocking this IP is ridiculous. This is a large university with over 30,000 students.|This has been used for making death threats so it doesn't seem that ridiculous. Why don't you contact the universities network team and see if they are willing to deal with the abuse of the service they provide?}}

{{unblock reviewed|A massively shared IP, blocking admin woggly says it is sockpuppet of Loserdick who has been making death threats, but after looking through this IP's and Loserdick's contributions I see no evidence of these two being linked. Neither Woggly, nor Pgk have responded to my futher questions about this IP, the alleged death threats or links to Loserdick, when I was about to report it to university admins. Which leads me to believe that this is not such a big issue for them at all and these "death threats" (which did not come from this IP, they came from Loserdick as I hear) were not put in any serious manner but were just childish slurs. While this IP has been in the past used by a number of geniuine users. And I think over 20 days of block could be enough to put off most bored vandals like Loserdick, if it was indeed him.|decline=Since death threats have been made by a member of this university, please ask somebody in the university's IT services department to contact Wikimedia via info@wikimedia.org or by calling +1-727-231-0101 --[[User_talk:Redvers|➨ ]]<b><font color="red">[[User:Redvers|ЯEDVERS]]</font></b> 08:49, 27 August 2006 (UTC)}}

[edit] 2 Sept 06

Thank you for experimenting with the page Davy Jones' Locker on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Ginkgo100 talk · e@ 23:02, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sept. 14

Thank you for experimenting with the page Failure on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Laws of war, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Sagaciousuk (talk) 23:15, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Diazepam on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Tony Fox (arf!) 05:28, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Hezbollah on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Kyra~(talk) 23:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked - 3 revert rule

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

-- Szvest 23:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "entire university blocked"

Decline reason: "registered users can continue to edit. Registering is free and easy, if you are serious about contributing to Wikipedia, register an account and persuade your university to track down and prohibit those who continue to vandalize and edit war from your fine institution Gwernol 03:24, 13 October 2006 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

ip has been blocked again.

[edit] Your edit to Westlake Boys' High School

Your recent edit to Westlake Boys' High School (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 22:35, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Knowledge management

Your recent edit to Knowledge management (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 04:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)